Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
Prognostic importance of apathy in syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Claire J Lansdall1, Ian T S Coyle-Gilchrist2, Patricia Vázquez Rodríguez2
1From the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (C.J.L., I.T.S.C.-G., P.V.R., A.W., E.W., J.B.R.) and Psychology (T.W.R.), and Behavioral and Clinical Neuroscience Institute (T.W.R., J.B.R.), University of Cambridge, UK; University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (E.W.), University of Hamburg, Germany; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (J.B.R.), Cambridge, UK. james.rowe@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Objective:
To determine the influence of apathy, impulsivity, and behavioral change on survival in patients with frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal syndrome.
Methods:
We assessed 124 patients from the epidemiologic PiPPIN (Pick's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Prevalence and Incidence) study. Patients underwent detailed baseline cognitive and behavioral assessment focusing on apathy, impulsivity, and behavioral change. Logistic regression identified predictors of death within 2.5 years from assessment, including age, sex, diagnosis, cognition, and 8 neurobehavioral profiles derived from a principal component analysis of neuropsychological and behavioral measures.
Results:
An apathetic neurobehavioral profile predicted death (Wald statistic = 8.119, p = 0.004, Exp(B) = 2.912, confidence interval = >1 [1.396-6.075]) and was elevated in all patient groups. This profile represented apathy, weighted strongly to carer reports from the Apathy Evaluation Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Cambridge Behavioral Inventory. Age at assessment, sex, and global cognitive impairment were not significant predictors. Differences in mortality risk across diagnostic groups were accounted for by their neuropsychiatric and behavioral features.
Conclusions:
The relationship between apathy and survival highlights the need to develop more effective and targeted measurement tools to improve its recognition and facilitate treatment. The prognostic importance of apathy suggests that neurobehavioral features might be useful to predict survival and stratify patients for interventional trials. Effective symptomatic interventions targeting the neurobiology of apathy might ultimately also improve prognosis.
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Irritable Bowel Syndrome I: Introduction
IBS is a chronic condition that can persist over a long period or recur frequently.
The pathogenesis of IBS involves a complex interplay of the following factors:
Altered...
Restless Leg Syndrome and Night Terrors
The exact cause of RLS is not fully understood, but it is believed to involve dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate muscle movement. Imbalances in dopamine levels...
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management

