Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

710
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
710
Load-frequency control01:28

Load-frequency control

661
Load-frequency control (LFC) is vital for maintaining power system stability, ensuring that frequency and power flows remain within acceptable limits during load changes. Turbine-governor control eliminates rotor accelerations and decelerations following load changes. However, a steady-state frequency error persists when the change in the turbine-governor reference setting is zero. In an interconnected power system, each area agrees to export or import a scheduled amount of power through...
661
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

57.1K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
57.1K
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:24

Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

363
Proportional-Derivative (PD) controllers are widely used in fan control systems to improve stability and performance. A fan control system can be effectively represented using a Bode plot to illustrate the impact of a PD controller through its transfer function. The Bode plot visually conveys how PD control modifies the fan's response across various frequencies, providing a frequency domain interpretation of the controller's behavior.
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
363
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control01:27

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

410
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
410

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulated electro-hyperthermia enhances tumor cell susceptibility to γδ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and tumor infiltration in NOD/SCID xenograft models.

International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group·2026
Same author

Texture Analysis of Subsolid Nodules Detected on Computed Tomography for Differentiating Minimally Invasive From Invasive Adenocarcinoma.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same author

Three-minute walk test as a practical screening tool for detecting exertional hypoxemia in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a real-world cohort study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Rad23b exacerbates pathological aggregates through disrupting proteasome functions in Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines against COVID-19 omicron variants in children aged 6-11 years in Taiwan.

Biomedical journal·2026
Same author

Atypical Dual-Task Cost and Reduced Attentional Neural Modulation in Parkinson's Disease With Freezing of Gait.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System
04:48

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Published on: May 8, 2018

11.5K

Improving Precision Force Control With Low-Frequency Error Amplification Feedback: Behavioral and Neurophysiological

Ing-Shiou Hwang1,2, Chia-Ling Hu2, Zong-Ru Yang1

  • 1Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Frontiers in Physiology
|March 8, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Low-frequency error amplification (LF-EA) feedback enhances visuomotor control by filtering out high-frequency noise. This method improves force control accuracy and neurophysiological mechanisms in static tasks.

Keywords:
EEGEMGforce fluctuationsstochastic processesvisuomotor

More Related Videos

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System
04:48

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System

Published on: May 8, 2018

11.5K
Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Error amplification (EA) feedback can improve visuomotor task performance.
  • However, EA also amplifies irrelevant information, potentially hindering visuomotor control.
  • Effective error correction requires timely processing of feedback signals by the visuomotor system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance force control in a static task by modifying EA feedback.
  • To exclude high-frequency oscillatory components from EA feedback that are too rapid for the visuomotor system to use for correction.
  • To investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying force control with different feedback strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of real feedback, standard error amplification (EA), and low-frequency error amplification (LF-EA) during a static force task.
  • Modeling of force fluctuations (Fc) using non-linear state-dependent parameterization (SDA).
  • Analysis of motor unit (MU) behaviors, corticomuscular coherence, and electroencephalogram (EEG)-electromyogram (EMG) coherence.

Main Results:

  • Low-frequency error amplification (LF-EA) resulted in greater task accuracy compared to real and EA feedback.
  • LF-EA produced smaller and more complex force fluctuations (Fc) with reduced SDA variables.
  • LF-EA increased motor unit discharge irregularity and enhanced beta-range EEG-EMG coherence.

Conclusions:

  • Amplifying low-frequency errors (LF-EA) improves force control by optimizing the balance between feedforward and feedback processes.
  • LF-EA promotes a stable state of motor unit discharges through increased common descending drive.
  • This approach offers a functional benefit by enhancing the efficiency of visuomotor error correction.