Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of three methods for estimating fetal weight.

L M Hill, R Breckle, K R Wolfgram

Journal of Clinical Ultrasound : JCU

|March 1, 1986

Summary

Comparing three ultrasonic fetal weight estimation methods, Campbell

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Medical Unit Program-(IFE4Her) to Enhance PrEP Awareness and Access Among Cis-gender Women in Low-Income Southeastern Communities: A Pilot Study.

AIDS and behavior·2026

Same author

Peer norms moderate the association between mental health and sexual risk behaviors among young men living in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2017

Same author

Evidence that glucose 6-phosphate is imported as the substrate for starch synthesis by the plastids of developing pea embryos.

Planta·2013

Same author

Gunshot wounds of the abdomen; a review of 149 cases.

Surgery·2010

Same author

Traumatic rupture of the liver without penetrating wounds; a study of 32 cases.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010

Same author

First-trimester trisomy screening: nuchal translucency measurement training and quality assurance to correct and unify technique.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2002

Area of Science:

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Medical Imaging
Fetal Medicine

Background:

Accurate fetal weight estimation is crucial for optimal obstetric management.
Ultrasound biometry is the primary method for estimating fetal weight (EFW).
Several formulas exist for EFW, but their comparative accuracy varies.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the accuracy of three established ultrasonic methods for estimating fetal weight: Campbell, Warsof, and Shepard.
To evaluate the impact of different fetal abdominal circumference measurement techniques on EFW accuracy.

Main Methods:

A prospective study involving 124 singleton pregnancies.
Fetal abdominal circumference was measured using a map measurer and derived from diameter measurements with the circle circumference equation.
Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated using Campbell, Warsof, and Shepard formulas.

Main Results:

Campbell's formula demonstrated superior accuracy for EFW between 2,000 and 4,000 g.
Shepard's method showed slightly better accuracy below 2,000 g and above 4,000 g.
For Campbell's and Shepard's methods, using diameter measurements and the circle equation yielded more accurate EFW than a map measurer.

Conclusions:

No single ultrasonic method is universally superior for all fetal weight ranges.
Institutions should evaluate multiple EFW methods to select the most accurate for their patient population.
Measurement techniques for fetal abdominal circumference significantly influence EFW accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos