Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement
Marjan Jahangiri1, Azhar Hussain1, Enoch Akowuah2
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract:
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is defined as a surgical aortic valve replacement which involves smaller chest incisions as opposed to full sternotomy. It is performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest. It benefits from potential advantages of a less invasive procedure. To date, over 14 000 MIAVR have been reported in the literature. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, different surgical techniques and mainly the non-randomised nature of these studies comparing MIAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The two main techniques of MIAVR are mini-sternotomy and right anterior mini-thoracotomy. Both techniques with other less common forms of MIAVR will be discussed in this review. The advantages, disadvantages and surgical pitfalls will be discussed. Some of the advantages include shorter intensive care and hospital stay, reduced perioperative blood loss, less pain, improved respiratory function and cosmesis. The possible disadvantage of longer bypass and cross-clamp times may be counter balanced by the recent sutureless and rapid deployment valves. Despite some of the benefits, MIAVR has not been adopted by a significant proportion of the surgeons possibly related to the learning curve and requirements for re-training. As MIAVR becomes more common, randomised trials comparing this technique with transcatheter aortic valve implantation is warranted. In addition, assessing quality of life including return to work and functional capacity is needed.
Insights
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) offers benefits like shorter recovery and less pain compared to traditional methods. Further research, including randomized trials, is needed to fully establish its effectiveness and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) involves smaller incisions than full sternotomy.
- Over 14,000 MIAVR procedures have been reported, but study heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of MIAVR.
- To discuss the current adoption challenges and future research directions for MIAVR.
Main Methods:
- Review of literature on MIAVR techniques, including mini-sternotomy and mini-thoracotomy.
- Discussion of reported benefits, drawbacks, and surgical considerations.
Main Results:
- MIAVR offers potential benefits such as reduced hospital stay, less blood loss, and improved cosmesis.
- Challenges include longer bypass times (mitigated by new valves) and surgeon learning curves.
Conclusions:
- MIAVR presents advantages but requires further randomized trials comparing it to conventional surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
- Assessment of quality of life and functional capacity post-MIAVR is necessary.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

