Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

The Bionic Clicker Mark I & II
Published on: August 14, 2017
Toward reliable population density estimates of partially marked populations using spatially explicit mark-resight
Andrew Carter1,2, Joanne M Potts3, David A Roshier1,4
1Australian Wildlife Conservancy Subiaco East Western Australia Australia.
Camera trap placement on or off tracks has minimal impact on red fox density estimates. However, survey precision depends on resighting rates of marked individuals, highlighting the need to consider species behavior.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife ecology
- Conservation biology
- Population dynamics
Background:
- Camera traps are increasingly used for estimating population density of elusive species.
- Standard practice involves placing cameras on roads, trails, and paths for efficiency, but reliability for density estimation is debated.
- Understanding spatial arrangement effects on density estimates is crucial for conservation and wildlife management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of camera-trap placement (on- vs. off-track) on population density estimates for red foxes (Vulpes vulpes).
- To assess how resighting rates of marked individuals influence density estimates using spatially explicit mark-resight models.
- To determine the reliability of track-based camera surveys for density estimation.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a two-year camera-trap survey in a semi-arid conservation reserve in south-eastern Australia.
- Employed several survey designs with varying camera placements (on-track and off-track).
- Utilized GPS collars to track individuals and assess resighting rates for mark-resight analysis with maximum likelihood spatially explicit models.
Main Results:
- Fox detection rates were significantly higher for cameras placed on tracks compared to off-track.
- Camera placement had minimal effect on the point estimates of red fox density.
- The precision of density estimates varied considerably, influenced by the number of marked foxes detected, resighting frequency, and unmarked fox detections.
Conclusions:
- The precision of population density estimates using spatially explicit mark-resight models is sensitive to the resighting rates of identifiable individuals.
- Both on-track and off-track camera surveys can yield reliable population density estimates when using spatially explicit mark-resight models.
- Incorporating species' spatial behavior into survey planning is essential for robust camera-trap studies.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Markings
Articulating Projections
Articulating projections are found where two bones meet to form a joint. These structures are usually found at the ends of bones. The largest articulation is a rounded projection called the head, supported by a narrow neck at the ends of...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...

