Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Impact of molecular testing in clinical practice in gynecologic cancers
Marilyn Huang1, Tegan Hunter2, Brian Slomovitz1
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Background:
With the growing understanding of the molecular and genetic profiles of cancers, targeted treatments are increasingly utilized in personalized cancer care. The objective of this study was to determine how these advances have translated into practice by examining how often molecular profiling of gynecological tumors led to treatment changes.
Methods:
We identified women with gynecological cancers at our institution who had molecular tumor testing performed from November 2014 to June 2017. Clinicopathologic data were extracted from medical records. We determined (a) if molecular profiling identified actionable targets for which therapy is available, and (b) whether the patient's treatment course changed as a result of molecular profiling. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Fisher's exact tests were used with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results:
We identified 152 patients with gynecologic cancers who underwent molecular profiling. Of the 152 patients, 116 (76.3%) had actionable mutations identified, with 41 (35.3%) patients having a treatment change. Stratified by cancer type, molecular profiling most frequently identified an actionable target in patients with endometrial cancer (73.6%). Changes in treatment occurred most frequently in patients with endometrial cancer, 22 (56.4%), and ovarian cancers, 16 (39%), as compared to patients with cervical and vulvar cancer (P = 0.02). Of those patients who received a change in treatment, 39 patients (95.1%) received an FDA-approved therapeutic agent, while two patients (4.8%) were enrolled in a clinical trial.
Conclusion:
Molecular profiling in gynecologic cancers often identified at least one actionable mutation; however, only in a minority of these cases was the course of treatment changed. Further studies are needed to elucidate optimal timing for testing to best utilize actionable information.
Insights
Molecular profiling of gynecologic tumors frequently identified actionable mutations. However, treatment changes occurred in less than half of these patients, indicating a need for further research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Personalized Medicine
Background:
- Advances in understanding cancer molecular and genetic profiles.
- Increasing utilization of targeted treatments in personalized cancer care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the translation of molecular profiling advances into clinical practice for gynecologic cancers.
- To determine the frequency of treatment changes resulting from molecular profiling of gynecologic tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 152 women with gynecologic cancers undergoing molecular tumor testing (Nov 2014 - June 2017).
- Extraction of clinicopathologic data and identification of actionable mutations.
- Statistical analysis (Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher's exact tests) to determine significance (P < 0.05).
Main Results:
- 116 out of 152 patients (76.3%) had actionable mutations identified.
- Treatment changes occurred in 41 patients (35.3%).
- Endometrial and ovarian cancers showed higher rates of actionable targets and treatment modifications compared to cervical and vulvar cancers.
Conclusions:
- Molecular profiling frequently identifies actionable mutations in gynecologic cancers.
- Treatment course modification remains infrequent despite actionable findings.
- Further research is required to optimize testing timing for better utilization of actionable information.
More Related Videos
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016