Ocular measurements of a swept-source biometer: Repeatability data and comparison with an optical low-coherence interferometry biometer
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
1Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Purpose:
To assess the repeatability of a swept-source biometer in phakic and pseudophakic patients, including astigmatism analysis, and to compare measurement data with those obtained by an optical low-coherence interferometry method.
Setting:
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Central Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Design:
Evaluation of diagnostic technologies.
Methods:
One eye of each patient was examined with the Argos and Aladdin devices. With the Argos, three repeated measurements were performed. Biometric parameters and cross-cylinder power vector components of astigmatism were assessed. Descriptive and repeatability data of the Argos were observed, and Bland-Altman plots were created.
Results:
The study comprised 96 eyes (50 phakic and 46 pseudophakic) of 96 patients (mean age 69.22 years and 71.14 years, respectively). The two devices showed a significant difference regarding astigmatism and corneal diameter in the phakic group (measured larger by Argos, P < .05). In the pseudophakic group, only the corneal diameter data were significantly different (measured larger by Argos, P = .02). No other statistically significant differences were observed in either group. An excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported on the Argos device in the case of all measured parameters except for the diopter values of astigmatism and the vector values of the astigmatism in the phakic group. In the pseudophakic group, the ICC was moderate in the case of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and good in the case of astigmatism and vectorial data.
Conclusions:
The repeatability data regarding the Argos biometer were excellent for all parameters except astigmatism data in both groups and ACD readings in the pseudophakic group. However, only a limited agreement was observed between these devices in both groups.
More Related Videos
06:15Author Spotlight: Anterior HR-OCT as a Non-Invasive Tool for Characterizing Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Published on: August 9, 2024
03:47Retinal and Choroidal Thickness Changes in Populations with Helicobacter pylori Infection by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: November 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
GIS Software, Hardware, and Sources of GIS Data
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs