Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Instruments assessing parental responsive feeding in children ages birth to 5 years: A systematic review
Rebecca L Heller1, Amy R Mobley2
1Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, 3624 Horsebarn Hill Road Ext, Unit 4017, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Insights
Responsive feeding practices protect against childhood obesity. A review found few validated instruments for assessing these practices in young children, highlighting a need for more comprehensive tools for diverse populations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Childhood Obesity Prevention
- Parenting and Child Development
Background:
- Responsive feeding is a key factor in preventing childhood obesity.
- Existing instruments for assessing parental responsive feeding in children aged 0-5 years were reviewed.
- The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided the review process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review instruments assessing responsive feeding practices in children aged birth to 5 years.
- To evaluate the development, validation, and reliability of these instruments.
- To identify gaps in current assessment tools regarding age groups, populations, and feeding practice aspects.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus) was conducted.
- Instruments were included if they assessed responsive feeding categories, underwent development/validation/reliability testing, and were used in children aged 0-5 years.
- Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies (ROBINS-I) tool.
Main Results:
- 33 responsive feeding instruments were identified; only three demonstrated rigorous validation and reliability.
- Limited instruments exist for infants (0-2 years), low-income families, diverse ethnic groups, and non-parental caregivers.
- Commonly assessed practices included 'Pressure to Eat,' 'Parental Control,' and 'Food Rewards,' with no instrument covering all responsive feeding aspects.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant need for more comprehensive instruments to assess all facets of responsive feeding.
- Further validation and reliability testing are required, especially in diverse and underrepresented populations.
- Improved assessment tools are crucial for effective childhood obesity prevention strategies.
Abstract:
Responsive feeding of young children has been identified as a protective factor against the development of childhood obesity. Instruments developed to assess responsive feeding by parents of children birth to 5 years of age over the past 17 years were reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus) were used to search for relevant articles to include at least one parental responsive feeding category (Food Rewards, Pressure to Eat, Parental Control of Intake, Emotional Feeding, or Responsiveness to Cues/Child Autonomy), development, validation, or reliability of the instrument, and evaluated in at least one child between ages birth to 5 years old. The final review included 33 individual responsive feeding related instruments. Risk of bias for each article was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. Of the 15 instruments intended for birth to 2-year-olds and the 28 intended for 3- to 5-year-olds, only three instruments showed rigorous validation and reliability testing (Feeding Practices and Structure Questionnaire, Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire, and Family Food Behavior Survey). The most commonly reported psychometric testing was construct validity and internal reliability. There were limited instruments intended for young children (birth to 2 years), low-income, diverse racial and ethnic groups (Hispanic and non-Hispanic black), and fathers or other caregivers. The most frequently assessed feeding practices included Pressure to Eat, Parental Control, and Food Rewards, but none of the instruments assessed all aspects of responsive feeding. This review identified the need for more comprehensive instruments that measure all aspects of responsive feeding, the need for further testing in diverse populations, and further validity and reliability testing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Parental Care
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Relationship with Parents: Attachment

