Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Research — Tailored Langendorff Perfusion Techniques for Improved Experimental Outcomes
Published on: June 14, 2024
Variation between hospitals in outcomes following cardiac surgery in the UK
G Soppa1, P Theodoropoulos1, R Bilkhu1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. George's Hospital , London , UK.
Insights
Hospital variations in cardiac surgery provision exist in the UK, but no clear link was found between these factors and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand variations in cardiac surgery care and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Cardiac surgery units in the UK have historically led in reporting surgeon-specific outcomes.
- This study investigates hospital-level factors influencing cardiac surgery outcomes beyond individual surgeon performance.
- The research aims to identify factors for adoption by other surgical specialties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the impact of hospital-level variations in UK cardiac surgery provision on patient outcomes.
- To assess potential inequalities in healthcare access and delivery within cardiac surgery.
- To identify non-surgeon factors affecting surgical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data (2013-2016) from 16 UK cardiac surgical units.
- Inclusion of patient demographics, risk factors, postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and hospital-level data (beds, operating theatres).
- Statistical analysis using Pearson's correlation coefficient and univariable/multivariable regression models.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 50,871 patients, with 25% over 75 years and 29% female.
- Significant variation observed in patient comorbidities, bed distribution, and staffing across units.
- Median survival was 97.9%; variations in outcomes and complications (e.g., re-sternotomy, mediastinitis) were noted between hospitals, but no significant association with hospital-level factors in multivariable models.
Conclusions:
- Hospital-level factors vary in cardiac surgery delivery and outcomes across the UK.
- No clear association was found between these hospital-level factors and patient outcomes.
- Discrepancies may stem from outcome definition, uncaptured risk factors, or individual team performance.
Introduction:
We examine the influence of variations in provision of cardiac surgery in the UK at hospital level on patient outcomes and also to assess whether there is an inequality of access and delivery of healthcare. Cardiothoracic surgery has pioneered the reporting of surgeon-specific outcomes, which other specialties have followed. We set out to identify factors other than the individual surgeon, which can affect outcomes and enable other surgical specialties to adopt a similar model.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patient and hospital level factors between 2013 and 2016 from 16 cardiac surgical units in the UK were analysed through the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and the Royal College of Surgeons Research Collaborative. Patient demographic data, risks factors, postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality, as well as hospital-level factors such as number of beds and operating theatres, were collected. Correlation between outcome measures was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Associations between hospital-level factors and outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable regression models.
Results:
Of 50,871 patients (60.5% of UK caseload), 25% were older than 75 years and 29% were female. There was considerable variation between units in patient comorbidities, bed distribution and staffing. All hospitals had dedicated cardiothoracic intensive care beds and consultants. Median survival was 97.9% (range 96.3-98.6%). Postoperative complications included re-sternotomy for bleeding (median 4.8%; range 3.5-6.9%) and mediastinitis (0.4%; 0.1-1.0%), transient ischaemic attack/cerebrovascular accident (1.7%; range 0.3-3.0%), haemofiltration (3.7%; range 0.8-6.8%), intra-aortic balloon pump use (3.3%; range 0.4-7.4%), tracheostomy (1.6%; range 1.3-2.6%) and laparotomy (0.3%; range 0.2-0.6%). There was variation in outcomes between hospitals. Univariable analysis showed a small number of positive associations between hospital-level factors and outcomes but none remained significant in multivariable models.
Conclusions:
Variations among hospital level factors exists in both delivery of, and outcomes, following cardiac surgery in the UK. However, there was no clear association between these factors and patient outcomes. This negative finding could be explained by differences in outcome definition, differences in risk factors between centres that are not captured by standard risk stratification scores or individual surgeon/team performance.
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
What is Variation?
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Variation of Atmospheric Pressure
Assuming the air temperature is constant at a given altitude and that the ideal gas law of thermodynamics describes the atmosphere to a good approximation, one can find the variation of atmospheric pressure with height.
Let p(y) be the atmospheric pressure at...

