Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.1K
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity01:23

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity

501
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
501
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

1.6K
Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
1.6K
Legal Guidelines for Documentation01:06

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

2.1K
The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
2.1K
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

6.1K
Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities.

Quantitative science studies·2025
Same author

The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action.

PLoS biology·2023
Same author

Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same journal

Behavior characteristics of peer reviewers in medical journals: a survey from China.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same journal

Publication integrity and industry influences on the editorial process: a case study.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same journal

Self-reported availability of research data in American Psychological Association journal articles: a cross-sectional investigation.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same journal

Indirect measurement of research misconduct among Iranian postgraduate students of medical sciences using the unmatched count technique.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same journal

Correction: Making scientific publishing more balanced and reversing the current dangerous drift to better support global environmental conservation and planetary health.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same journal

Expert opinion in decision-making: a systematic review of methods and the INTEGRITY framework for incorporating expert consultation into research.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K

Guidelines for open peer review implementation.

Tony Ross-Hellauer1, Edit Görögh2

  • 11Know-Center GmbH and Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz, Austria.

Research Integrity and Peer Review
|March 13, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Open peer review (OPR) is gaining traction but faces implementation challenges. This article provides best-practice guidelines for journals transitioning to OPR, based on stakeholder input.

Keywords:
GuidelinesOpen peer reviewOpen sciencePeer reviewScholarly publishing

More Related Videos

Orienteering as a Tool for Cognitive Research: An Implementation Guide
07:13

Orienteering as a Tool for Cognitive Research: An Implementation Guide

Published on: November 29, 2024

1.4K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K
Orienteering as a Tool for Cognitive Research: An Implementation Guide
07:13

Orienteering as a Tool for Cognitive Research: An Implementation Guide

Published on: November 29, 2024

1.4K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Open peer review (OPR) adoption is increasing, yet understanding and researcher attitudes present significant barriers.
  • A growing number of journals are experimenting with various OPR models, highlighting the need for clear implementation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the knowledge gap regarding OPR implementation by developing best-practice guidelines.
  • To provide practical guidance for editors and journals seeking to transition to open peer review processes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of guidelines based on an interactive stakeholder workshop.
  • Informed by practical experience and expert input from the scholarly publishing community.

Main Results:

  • A set of best-practice guidelines for implementing open peer review has been established.
  • The guidelines are primarily tailored for scientific journal editors and publishers.

Conclusions:

  • The developed guidelines offer a framework for successful OPR transition in scientific journals.
  • Principles outlined may be adaptable for implementing OPR in other scholarly domains like books and conference submissions.