Erratum to spontaneous coronary artery dissection: from expert consensus statements to evidence-based medicine
Fernando Alfonso1, Marcos García-Guimaraes1, Teresa Bastante1
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
This study corrects a previous article DOI. The corrected DOI is 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.10.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics and Scientific Publishing
Background:
- Correction of previously published article DOI.
- Ensuring accurate citation and discoverability of scientific literature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide the correct Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for a specific article.
- To rectify an error in the article's metadata.
Main Methods:
- Identifying the incorrect DOI in the original publication.
- Verifying and confirming the correct DOI through established scholarly databases.
Main Results:
- The correct DOI for the article is 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.10.
- The previous DOI was erroneous, potentially hindering access and citation.
Conclusions:
- Accurate DOIs are crucial for the integrity and accessibility of scientific research.
- This correction ensures proper referencing and retrieval of the intended article.
Abstract:
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.10.].
More Related Videos
06:39Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
05:50International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
Published on: March 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Spontaneity
The Evidence for Evolution
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
