Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Residency Selection
• Applicant Assessment

Background:

• Traditional residency selection heavily relies on academic metrics.
• There is a need for tools to facilitate a more holistic review process.
• Assessing non-academic competencies is crucial for residency success.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the feasibility of the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI).
• To gather evidence on the validity of SVI total scores for residency selection.
• To explore the SVI's role in a holistic application review.

Main Methods:

• The study involved two phases: a research study (2016) and an operational pilot (2017).
• Data from 855 (Study 1) and 3,532 (Study 2) applicants were analyzed.
• Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, correlations, and standardized mean differences.

Main Results:

• SVI total scores were normally distributed with minimal correlations to USMLE Step exam scores and honor society memberships.
• No significant score differences were observed based on gender or race/ethnicity.
• Small to medium differences in scores were noted based on applicant type.

Conclusions:

• Initial evidence supports the validity of SVI total scores.
• SVI scores provide distinct information compared to academic metrics.
• The SVI can aid in widening the applicant pool and emphasizing interpersonal skills and professionalism.