Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model
Published on: May 20, 2019
Single-center real-life experience with low-dose ipilimumab monotherapy in adjuvant setting for patients with stage
Joanna Mangana1, Florentia Dimitriou1, Ralph Braun1
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich.
Ipilimumab is approved for adjuvant melanoma treatment at a dose of 10 mg/kg, but its use is limited owing to high toxicity and treatment-associated costs. We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who underwent complete resection of stage IIC-III melanoma and were treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in an adjuvant setting. The aim was to assess development of adverse events (primary endpoint) and to evaluate survival outcomes (secondary endpoint) under adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab in a real-life setting. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) of all grades were reported in 72.4% of patients, grade 3 in 5.3% (n = 2), and none for grade 4 or 5. Immune-related hypophysitis resolved in 3/8 (37.5%) and immune-related thyroiditis in 7/10 (70%) cases, whereas the others remained on substitution drugs. The rest irAEs affected the gut (n = 8), skin (n = 5), liver (n = 2), and uvea (n = 2) and resolved completely. Only one patient required tumor necrosis factor-α owing to grade 3 colitis. Hospitalization was required in five cases owing to irAE (four colitis and one hypophysitis). At a median follow-up of 9.7 (1.7-16.8) months, 65.5% of the patients were free of disease. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 months, and median overall survival was not reached yet. Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients with fully resected melanoma favors a better safety profile compared with the approved dose of 10 mg/kg in the same setting. Although its limited application owing lately promising data of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment, it may be considered as additional option or second-line treatment after fully resected disease recurrence under antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment.
Ipilimumab is approved for adjuvant melanoma treatment at a dose of 10 mg/kg, but its use is limited owing to high toxicity and treatment-associated costs. We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who underwent complete resection of stage IIC-III melanoma and were treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in an adjuvant setting. The aim was to assess development of adverse events (primary endpoint) and to evaluate survival outcomes (secondary endpoint) under adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab in a real-life setting. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) of all grades were reported in 72.4% of patients, grade 3 in 5.3% (n = 2), and none for grade 4 or 5. Immune-related hypophysitis resolved in 3/8 (37.5%) and immune-related thyroiditis in 7/10 (70%) cases, whereas the others remained on substitution drugs. The rest irAEs affected the gut (n = 8), skin (n = 5), liver (n = 2), and uvea (n = 2) and resolved completely. Only one patient required tumor necrosis factor-α owing to grade 3 colitis. Hospitalization was required in five cases owing to irAE (four colitis and one hypophysitis). At a median follow-up of 9.7 (1.7-16.8) months, 65.5% of the patients were free of disease. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 months, and median overall survival was not reached yet. Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients with fully resected melanoma favors a better safety profile compared with the approved dose of 10 mg/kg in the same setting. Although its limited application owing lately promising data of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment, it may be considered as additional option or second-line treatment after fully resected disease recurrence under antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Patient-centered Care
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...

