The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Isolation of Intrapulmonary Artery and Smooth Muscle Cells to Investigate Vascular Responses
Published on: June 8, 2022
Aaron J Ancell1, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong2
1EJ Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
This study addresses criticisms of a medical conscientious objection proposal. It clarifies the proposal's scope and necessity as a political compromise, offering a framework for evaluating such compromises.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Public Policy
Background:
- A proposal for managing conscientious objections in medicine has been criticized.
- The criticism mischaracterizes the proposal's nature, scope, and implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correct mischaracterizations of a proposal for managing conscientious objections in medicine.
- To explain the necessity of compromise in specific political contexts.
- To establish criteria for evaluating proposed compromises.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of Robert Card's critique.
- Re-explanation of the proposal's objectives and limitations.
- Development of a framework for evaluating medical ethics compromises.
Main Results:
- Card's critique inaccurately represents the proposal.
- Compromise is deemed necessary due to the specific political context.
- A methodology for evaluating compromises is presented.
Conclusions:
- The proposal is a nuanced compromise, not fully understood by critics.
- Political context is crucial for ethical policy development.
- A structured approach is needed to evaluate ethical compromises in medicine.
Abstract:
Robert Card criticises our proposal for managing some conscientious objections in medicine. Unfortunately, he severely mischaracterises the nature of our proposal, its scope and its implications. He also overlooks the fact that our proposal is a compromise designed for a particular political context. We correct Card's mischaracterisations, explain why we believe compromise is necessary and explain how we think proposed compromises should be evaluated.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Potential Due to a Magnetized Object
The vector...
Responses to Gravity and Touch
Moment of Inertia of Compound Objects
Consider a child of mass (mc) 25 kg standing at a distance (rc) of 1 m from the axis of a rotating...
Gravitational Potential Energy for Extended Objects
Humoral Immune Responses

