Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

660
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
660
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods01:19

Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods

6.0K
In argentometric precipitation titrations, endpoints can be detected visually by the Mohr, Volhard, and Fajans methods. In the Mohr method, adding a soluble chromate indicator gives an initial yellow color to the analyte solution. As the titrant is added, the first excess of silver ions forms a red silver chromate precipitate, marking the endpoint. The solution pH should be maintained at about 8 by adding solid CaCO3.
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
6.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.0K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.0K
Areas Within Irregular Boundaries01:26

Areas Within Irregular Boundaries

371
Calculating areas within irregular boundaries, such as along rivers or curved roads, is crucial in various fields, including surveying, engineering, and environmental management. Surveyors often begin by creating a traverse, a connected series of straight lines approximating the area's boundary. The coordinates of each traverse point are essential for calculating the enclosed area. The double meridian distance formula is a widely used technique for this purpose. This method utilizes the...
371
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maternal ambient air pollution exposure and risk of stillbirth in Georgia, USA.

Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

The Flip Sides of Interventional Glaucoma.

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma·2026
Same author

Design and Validation of an AI-Assisted Sequential Screening Framework for Psychological Distress in Glaucoma.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile App Psychosocial Intervention for Psychological Distress in Individuals with Glaucoma.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Utilizing virus genomic surveillance to predict vaccine effectiveness.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Modelling spatial heterogeneity in exposure buffers and risk: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Detection of Lung Tumor Progression in Mice by Ultrasound Imaging
04:43

Detection of Lung Tumor Progression in Mice by Ultrasound Imaging

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.3K

Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method.

Samuel I Berchuck1, Jean-Claude Mwanza2, Angelo P Tanna3

  • 1Department of Statistical Science and Forge, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Scientific Reports
|March 16, 2019
PubMed
Summary

A new tool, spatiotemporal boundary detection predictor of glaucomatous visual field progression (STBound), shows improved accuracy in detecting glaucoma progression compared to existing methods. It can be used alongside current techniques for better patient monitoring.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field
04:21

Author Spotlight: Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field

Published on: July 28, 2023

2.6K
A Sensitive Visual Method for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria
03:55

A Sensitive Visual Method for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria

Published on: June 27, 2022

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Detection of Lung Tumor Progression in Mice by Ultrasound Imaging
04:43

Detection of Lung Tumor Progression in Mice by Ultrasound Imaging

Published on: February 27, 2020

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field
04:21

Author Spotlight: Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field

Published on: July 28, 2023

2.6K
A Sensitive Visual Method for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria
03:55

A Sensitive Visual Method for the Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide Producing Bacteria

Published on: June 27, 2022

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness globally.
  • Accurate monitoring of glaucoma progression is clinically challenging.
  • Existing methods for detecting visual field progression have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic ability of a novel spatiotemporal boundary detection predictor (STBound) for glaucomatous visual field progression.
  • To compare STBound's performance against established progression detection methods.
  • To assess the potential of STBound as a clinical diagnostic tool.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal visual field data from 191 eyes of 91 glaucoma patients were analyzed.
  • STBound was compared with Spatial PROGgression and traditional trend-based methods (GI regression, mean regression slope, etc.).
  • Performance was assessed using Akaike information criterion (AIC), AUC/pAUC, sensitivity, and specificity.

Main Results:

  • STBound demonstrated superior diagnostic ability (AIC: 197.77 vs. 204.11-217.55; AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.63-0.70).
  • STBound showed no significant correlation with competing methods (r: -0.01-0.11).
  • Combining STBound with global index (GI) regression further improved performance.

Conclusions:

  • STBound is a valuable tool for differentiating progressing from non-progressing glaucoma.
  • STBound offers improved diagnostic accuracy over existing methods.
  • STBound can be effectively used in conjunction with current clinical practices for glaucoma management.