Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Subculture and Cryopreservation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Organoids: Pros and Cons for Single Cell Digestion
Published on: July 6, 2022
Pros and cons of antithrombotic therapy in end-stage kidney disease: a 2019 update
Alexandru Burlacu1, Simonetta Genovesi2, Alberto Ortiz3
1Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, 'Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine, Iasi, Romania.
Insights
Patients on dialysis face high risks of blood clots and bleeding. This expert consensus reviews antithrombotic therapies, balancing clot prevention with bleeding reduction in chronic kidney disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Hematology
Background:
- Dialysis patients exhibit elevated risks for both thrombosis and hemorrhage.
- Many patients requiring dialysis have cardiovascular comorbidities, necessitating antithrombotic treatment for primary or secondary prevention.
- Limited randomized controlled trials exist for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies in dialysis populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an expert consensus on antithrombotic therapy for dialysis patients.
- To guide physicians in making informed decisions regarding antithrombotic treatment.
- To balance atherothrombotic and cardioembolic risk reduction with minimizing bleeding events.
Main Methods:
- Review of up-to-date evidence on antithrombotic therapy in dialysis patients.
- Discussion of clinical settings and therapeutic strategies based on available data.
- Highlighting data from observational studies on antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, alone or in combination.
Main Results:
- Current cardiology and nephrology guidelines offer ambiguous or exclusionary recommendations for these patients.
- Observational data provides insights into the risks and benefits of antithrombotic agents.
- The optimal strategy requires careful consideration of individual patient profiles.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for expert consensus to address the management of antithrombotic therapy in dialysis patients.
- Therapeutic choices should aim to minimize thrombotic risk while concurrently reducing bleeding events.
- Further research is needed to clarify optimal antithrombotic strategies in specific clinical situations.
Abstract:
Dialysis patients manifest both an increased thrombotic risk and a haemorrhagic tendency. A great number of patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis have cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) and different indications for treatment with antithrombotics (primary or secondary prevention). Unfortunately, few randomized controlled trials deal with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy in dialysis. Therefore cardiology and nephrology guidelines offer ambiguous recommendations and often exclude or ignore these patients. In our opinion, there is a need for an expert consensus that provides physicians with useful information to make correct decisions in different situations requiring antithrombotics. Herein the European Dialysis Working Group presents up-to-date evidence about the topic and encourages practitioners to choose among alternatives in order to limit bleeding and minimize atherothrombotic and cardioembolic risks. In the absence of clear evidence, these clinical settings and consequent therapeutic strategies will be discussed by highlighting data from observational studies for and against the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs alone or in combination. Until new studies shed light on unclear clinical situations, one should keep in mind that the objective of treatment is to minimize thrombotic risk while reducing bleeding events.
Related Concept Videos
SI Units: 2019 Redefinition
A standard set of units has been defined...
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Kidney Structure

