Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
Comparison of equiosmolar dose of hyperosmolar agents in reducing intracranial pressure-a randomized control study in
S Arun Kumar1, Bhagavatula Indira Devi1, Madhusudan Reddy2
1Department of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.
Insights
Equiosmolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline equally reduce intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Both treatments showed similar outcomes for reducing intracranial pressure and improving patient survival.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Neurotrauma management
- Pharmacological interventions for intracranial pressure
Background:
- Hyperosmolar therapy is crucial for managing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
- Limited comparative studies exist on equiosmolar hyperosmolar agents in pediatric populations.
- This study addresses the need for evidence comparing mannitol and hypertonic saline in children with TBI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare the efficacy of equiosmolar doses of mannitol and 3% hypertonic saline in reducing intracranial pressure in children with severe TBI.
- To evaluate the impact of these treatments on neurological outcomes at 6 months post-injury.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
- Thirty pediatric patients (≤16 years) with severe TBI and elevated ICP were enrolled.
- Patients received either 20% mannitol or 3% hypertonic saline (2.5 ml/kg bolus) for ICP management.
Main Results:
- The mean reduction in intracranial pressure was 7.13 mmHg for mannitol and 5.67 mmHg for hypertonic saline (p=0.33), showing no statistically significant difference.
- The incidence of death or persistent vegetative state was 23.07% with mannitol and 16.66% with hypertonic saline (p=0.69), also not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Equiosmolar mannitol and hypertonic saline demonstrate comparable effectiveness in managing elevated intracranial pressure in pediatric severe TBI.
- Both agents are equally suitable for clinical use in this patient population, with similar impacts on mortality and long-term outcomes.
Introduction:
There are no comparative studies available for hyperosmolar therapy in children. The present study is a prospective open label randomized control trial to compare the effect of equiosmolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline in reducing intracranial pressure in children who sustained severe traumatic brain injury.
Methods:
This is a prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Thirty children aged less than or equal to 16 years with severe traumatic brain injury and raised intracranial pressure as measured by ventricular catheter insertion were enrolled. Sixteen children received 20% mannitol, and 14 children received 3% saline as 2.5 ml/kg bolus for episodes of intracranial pressure above cutoff value for age. The mean reduction in intracranial pressure and Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months after injury was measured.
Results:
The mean reduction in intracranial pressure in mannitol group was 7.13 mmHg and in hypertonic saline group was 5.67 mmHg, and the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.33. The incidence of death or survival in vegetative state was 23.07% in mannitol group and 16.66% in hypertonic saline group, and the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.69.
Conclusion:
Both mannitol and hypertonic saline were equally effective for treatment of raised intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury.
Related Concept Videos
Redox Titration: Other Oxidizing and Reducing Agents
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

