Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Modification and Functionalization of the Guanidine Group by Tailor-made Precursors
Published on: April 27, 2017
Planarity or Nonplanarity: Modulating Guanidine Derivatives as α2-Adrenoceptors Ligands
Cristina Trujillo1, Aoife Flood1, Goar Sánchez-Sanz2
1School of Chemistry , Trinity College Dublin , 152-160 Pearse Street , Dublin 2 , Ireland.
Abstract:
A theoretical study has been carried out at the M062X/6-311++G(d,p) computational level to search for a rationale on ligands' affinity toward α2-adrenoceptors by estimating the nature and strength of intramolecular hydrogen bonds potentially formed (by means of the QTAIM and NBO approaches) as well as the degree of deviation from planarity that could be observed in some of the compounds. Four different families have been studied: thiophen-2-yl, 3-carboxylatethiophen-2-yl esters, 3-cyanothiophen-2-yl, and 2-thiazolyl guanidinium derivatives. In the case of the thiophen-2-yl guanidines not substituted in the 3 position, nonplanarity was always observed, whereas in the thiazole series, intramolecular hydrogen bonds were identified between the guanidinium and the thiazole ring forcing the systems to planarity. Regarding the carboxylic esters, two different rotamers were found: quasi-planar and quasi-perpendicular systems with very similar energy. Both of these isomers can form different nets of intramolecular hydrogen bonds and other types of noncovalent interactions. Different physicochemical properties such as basicity, solubility, or lipophilicity were calculated for these systems, but no correlation to the degree of planarity was found. However, when comparing the α2-ARs affinity with the planarity of the molecules, a trend appears in the thiophen-2-yl guanidinium series indicating that lack of planarity seems to be optimal for α2-ARs engagement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Adrenergic Receptors (Adrenoceptors): Classification
α-Adrenoceptors
α-Adrenoceptors are classified into two main subtypes: α1 and α2. The α1 adrenoceptors,...
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Ligand Binding and Linkage

