Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Subcutaneous inoculation position affects the immune environment in CT26 carcinomas
Xiaocong Fu1, Yeguo Yang2, Jinling Xie1
1Guangxi Key Laboratory of Efficacy Study on Chinese Materia Medica, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, 530200, PR China; Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Research on Functional Ingredients of Agricultural Residues, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, 530200, China; Guangxi Scientific Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, 530200, PR China.
Tumor inoculation site impacts CT26 colon carcinoma growth and immune response. Different flank locations alter anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 efficacy, affecting immune cell populations and cytokine expression in mice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The CT26 colon carcinoma cell line is a standard model for studying IDO-1 inhibitors and immune checkpoint antibodies.
- Understanding factors influencing tumor microenvironment and treatment response is crucial for effective cancer therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of subcutaneous inoculation location on CT26 tumor growth and immune factor expression in mice.
- To evaluate how inoculation site affects the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
Main Methods:
- CT26 cells were inoculated in the right upper or lower flank of Balb/c mice.
- Tumor growth was monitored, and tumors were analyzed for immune cell subpopulations and immune factors using FACS.
- Mice received treatments including an IDO-1 inhibitor (INCB024360), anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, or no treatment.
Main Results:
- In vitro, CT26 cells treated with INCB024360 showed consistent IC50 values and peak inhibitory rates.
- In vivo, tumor volumes and the anti-tumor effects of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 differed significantly based on inoculation site.
- The upper flank site showed higher CD8+T cell and INF-γ populations but lower myeloid cell and regulatory T cell (Treg) populations compared to the lower flank.
Conclusions:
- Tumor inoculation location significantly influences the tumor microenvironment and the efficacy of immunotherapies like anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4.
- CT26 tumors derived from the same cell line but different inoculation sites should be considered distinct models due to variations in immune cell composition and response.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering anatomical site in preclinical cancer models.
More Related Videos
10:35Generation of Subcutaneous and Intrahepatic Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Xenografts in Immunodeficient Mice
Published on: September 25, 2013
08:32Enrichment and Characterization of the Tumor Immune and Non-immune Microenvironments in Established Subcutaneous Murine Tumors
Published on: June 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
What is the Immune System?
Position-effect Variegation
Position and Displacement
Serial Position Effect
Humoral Immune Responses