Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.0K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.0K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.0K
10.0K
Nuclear Binding Energy02:13

Nuclear Binding Energy

14.7K
The difference between the calculated and experimentally measured masses is known as the mass defect of the atom. In the case of helium-4, the mass defect indicates a “loss” in mass of 4.0331 amu – 4.0026 amu = 0.0305 amu. The loss in mass accompanying the formation of an atom from protons, neutrons, and electrons is due to the conversion of that mass into energy that is evolved as the atom forms. The nuclear binding energy is the energy produced when the atoms’ nucleons are bound...
14.7K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.0K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.9K
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A unified neurocomputational model of prospective and retrospective timing.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Modelling neural probabilistic computation using vector symbolic architectures.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2024
Same author

A spiking neural model of decision making and the speed-accuracy trade-off.

Psychological review·2024
Same author

A scalable spiking amygdala model that explains fear conditioning, extinction, renewal and generalization.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Exploiting semantic information in a spiking neural SLAM system.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023
Same author

Biologically-Based Computation: How Neural Details and Dynamics Are Suited for Implementing a Variety of Algorithms.

Brain sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K

Vector-Derived Transformation Binding: An Improved Binding Operation for Deep Symbol-Like Processing in Neural

Jan Gosmann1, Chris Eliasmith2

  • 1Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada jgosmann@uwaterloo.ca.

Neural Computation
|March 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Vector-derived transformation binding (VTB) offers improved performance for neurally implemented vector symbolic architectures (VSAs) compared to holographic reduced representations (HRRs). VTB demonstrates better stack encoding capacity and less impact on vector length, making it a promising advancement.

More Related Videos

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.9K
LabVIEW-operated Novel Nanoliter Osmometer for Ice Binding Protein Investigations
09:32

LabVIEW-operated Novel Nanoliter Osmometer for Ice Binding Protein Investigations

Published on: February 4, 2013

21.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.9K
LabVIEW-operated Novel Nanoliter Osmometer for Ice Binding Protein Investigations
09:32

LabVIEW-operated Novel Nanoliter Osmometer for Ice Binding Protein Investigations

Published on: February 4, 2013

21.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Vector symbolic architectures (VSAs) are a framework for cognitive modeling.
  • Holographic reduced representations (HRRs) utilize circular convolution for binding operations.
  • Neural Engineering Framework (NEF) provides a method for implementing neural systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce and evaluate vector-derived transformation binding (VTB) as a novel binding operation for VSAs.
  • Compare VTB's performance against circular convolution (used in HRRs) for list and stack encoding.
  • Assess the suitability of VTB for neural implementation using the NEF.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the vector-derived transformation binding (VTB) operation.
  • Performed comparative analysis of VTB and circular convolution on encoding capacity (lists and stacks).
  • Evaluated neural resource scaling and vector length influence for VTB within the NEF context.

Main Results:

  • VTB shows comparable list encoding capacity to circular convolution.
  • VTB demonstrates superior stack encoding capacity compared to circular convolution.
  • VTB exhibits less influence on vector length, advantageous for neural implementation.
  • Neural resource scaling for VTB is slightly worse but acceptable.

Conclusions:

  • VTB is a viable and improved alternative to HRRs for neurally implemented VSAs.
  • The benefits of VTB in encoding capacity and neural implementation outweigh its resource scaling.
  • VTB represents a significant advancement for building biologically plausible cognitive architectures.