A finite difference method with subsampling for immersed boundary simulations of the capsule dynamics with...

The membrane or interfacial viscosity is an important property in many multiphase and biofluidic situations, such as the red blood cell dynamics and emulsion stability. The immersed boundary method (IBM), which incorporates the dynamic flow-membrane interaction via force distribution and velocity interpolation, has been extensively employed in simulations of such systems. Unfortunately, direct implementation of membrane viscosity in IBM suffers severe numerical instability, which causes an IBM calculation to break down before generating any useful results. Few attempts have been recently reported; however, several concerns exist in these attempts, such as the inconsistency to the classical definition of membrane viscosity, the inability to model the shear and dilatational viscosities separately, the unjustified mathematical formulations, and the complicated algorithms and computation. To overcome these concerns, in this paper, we propose a finite difference approach for implementing membrane viscosity in immersed boundary simulations. The viscous stress is obtained via finite difference approximations to the differential strain-stress relationship, with the help of a subsampling scheme to reduce the numerical noise in the calculated strain rates. This simple method has also avoided the complicated matrix calculations in previous attempts, and hence, a better computational efficiency is expected. Detailed mathematical description of the method and key steps for its implementation in immersed boundary programs are provided. Validation and illustration calculations are performed, and our results are compared with analytical solutions and previous publications with satisfactory agreement. The influences of membrane mesh resolution and simulation time step are also examined; and the results show no indication that our finite difference method has downgraded the general IBM accuracy. Based on these simulations and analysis, we believe that our method would be a better choice for future IBM simulations of capsule dynamics with viscoelastic membranes.