Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results
Friederike Cantner1, Claudio Cacaci1, Thomas Mücke2
1Private Dental Office, Weinstraße 4, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Objectives:
The objective of this clinical study was to compare and assess the clinical performance of tooth-supported and implant-supported zirconia single crowns with sintered veneering caps.
Methods:
In this prospective study, 118 patients with a total of 220 single crowns placed on 106 teeth (69 vital teeth, 37 endodontically treated teeth) and 114 implants in molar and premolar regions were examined during a mean observation period of 42 months. The restorations were evaluated for technical failures such as veneering porcelain fractures (chipping), surface quality, marginal fit, and the interface quality of the coping and sintered veneering. The soft tissue status was assessed using the modified Silness and Löe's plaque and gingival index (mPI) and the modified Muhlemann sulcus bleeding index (mSBI). Tooth-supported crowns were checked for secondary caries and hypersensitivity during the follow-up period. Recalls were performed every 6 months.
Results:
The 3-year Kaplan-Meier success probability was 98.2% and 100% for implant- and tooth-supported crowns, respectively. A significant difference could be detected between the implant-supported and tooth-supported zirconia single crowns, in terms of their chipping rate (p = 0.039). Veneering material fractures were recorded on two implant-supported restorations (1.8%). No veneering fractures occurred on tooth-supported single crowns. The plaque and gingival index and sulcus bleeding index showed stable and healthy soft peri-implant and periodontal tissues. Neither loss of vitality nor secondary caries occurred on tooth-supported crowns.
Conclusions:
Zirconia-based single crowns with a sintered veneering cap showed promising clinical results on both tooth and implant abutments; however, the dental implants were more prone to complications. In terms of clinical significance, high-strength ceramic with a sintered veneering cap can be recommended for prosthetic treatment of both tooth- and implant-supported single crowns in molar regions.
Clinical Relevance:
This study provides valuable information for further application of all-ceramic restorations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Veneer
Other veneering techniques include plain-slicing, quarter-slicing, and rift-slicing. These...
Crown Ethers
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Support Reactions
The purpose of the supports is to prevent the translational motion of the system by applying an equal and opposite force and to prevent the system's rotation by applying...
Support Reactions in Three Dimensions
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...

