Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Studying Triple Negative Breast Cancer Using Orthotopic Breast Cancer Model
Published on: March 20, 2020
Discrepancies of current recommendations in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review
Anastasios Kyriazoglou1, Flora Zagouri2, Despina Fotiou2
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, General Hospital Alexandra, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece. tassoskyr@gmail.com.
Introduction:
Management and optimal follow-up of early breast cancer survivors remain up to this day a challenge due to the lack of well-established guidelines. Multiple medical societies, organizations and working groups have provided recommendations for follow-up but there is no uniform, globally approved algorithm to guide clinical practice.
Methods:
A systematic review was performed to identify and evaluate discrepancies between available guidelines for the follow-up of breast cancer survivors.
Results:
Differences in the follow-up schedule, laboratory and imaging investigations were noted. In the clinical practice setting, the situation is complicated further by clinicians who often request unnecessary tests not currently incorporated in any of the existing guidelines.
Conclusions:
Follow-up of patients with early breast cancer needs to become standardized and prospective clinical trials focusing on optimal follow-up are more than mandatory.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

