Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
What is the best method for calculating the optimal position of an esophageal pH probe in children?
J V Arcos-Machancoses1, D García Tirado1, V Vila Miravet1
1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Insights
Nowak's formula is the most accurate for positioning esophageal pH sensors in children, improving accuracy and reducing radiation. However, confirmatory X-rays remain advisable due to potential misplacements.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Medical Device Placement
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Accurate placement of distal esophageal pH monitoring sensors is crucial for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
- Current methods for estimating probe insertion depth based on patient height have varying degrees of accuracy.
- Fluoroscopy is often used to confirm sensor placement, increasing radiation exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of different formulas and methods for estimating esophageal pH probe insertion depth in pediatric patients.
- To identify the most reliable method for sensor placement to minimize fluoroscopy use and improve diagnostic accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection from 98 pediatric patients (2 months to 19 years) undergoing esophageal pH monitoring.
- Comparison of actual probe positions (confirmed by fluoroscopy) with distances estimated by Nowak's, Strobel's, Staiano-Clouse's, Moreau's formulae, and the GOSH table.
- Analysis of formula accuracy across different age groups.
Main Results:
- Nowak's formula (3.2 + 0.2 × height in cm) demonstrated the highest overall success rate (67%) across all age groups.
- The Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) table showed high accuracy in children under 3 but potentially overestimated correct placements.
- A corrected Staiano-Clouse formula showed slightly lower accuracy than Nowak's, particularly in younger children.
Conclusions:
- Nowak's formula is the most accurate method for estimating esophageal pH probe insertion depth in pediatric patients, regardless of age.
- Utilizing Nowak's formula can reduce reliance on fluoroscopy and probe manipulation, thereby lowering radiation exposure.
- Despite its accuracy, Nowak's formula still results in misplacements in over one-third of children, making a confirmatory X-ray advisable.
Abstract:
In assessment of distal esophageal pH, the sensor of the probe should be placed above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter. There are several methods to estimate the distance from the nose where the probe should be fixed according to the patient's height. We studied the accuracy of these methods. Data of patients who underwent esophageal monitoring were collected prospectively. The esophageal pH electrode was set with the aid of fluoroscopy in all cases, considering the location recommended by the current guideline. Esophageal probe position and anthropometric data of each patient were recorded. We compared the actual esophageal pH electrode distance from the nose with that estimated by Nowak's, Strobel's, Staiano-Clouse's, and Moreau's formulae and the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) table. A total of 98 patients were included, with ages ranging from 2 months to 19 years old. The highest success rate (67%) for all age groups was achieved by Nowak's formula (3.2 + 0.2 × height in cm). Considering only children under 3 years old, the GOSH table reached the highest-yet probably overestimated-fraction of adequate predictions. A corrected Staiano and Clouse's formula (4.28 + 0.191 × height in cm) had a slightly lower success rate than Nowak's due to a poorer performance in younger children. In conclusion, Nowak's formula is the most accurate regardless of age. It can help reduce radiation due to systematic fluoroscopy, as well as the subsequent manipulation of the esophageal probe. However, it still leads to pH sensor misplacements in more than one-third of children. In consequence, a confirmatory X-ray is advisable even after using the formula.
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Calculating the Equilibrium Constant
For example, gaseous nitrogen dioxide forms dinitrogen tetroxide according to this equation:
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...

