Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
CT temporal subtraction improves early detection of bone metastases compared to SPECT
Koji Onoue1, Mizuho Nishio2,3, Masahiro Yakami1,4
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Objectives:
To compare observer performance of detecting bone metastases between bone scintigraphy, including planar scan and single-photon emission computed tomography, and computed tomography (CT) temporal subtraction (TS).
Methods:
Data on 60 patients with cancer who had undergone CT (previous and current) and bone scintigraphy were collected. Previous CT images were registered to the current ones by large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping; the registered previous images were subtracted from the current ones to produce TS. Definitive diagnosis of bone metastases was determined by consensus between two radiologists. Twelve readers independently interpreted the following pairs of examinations: NM-pair, previous and current CTs and bone scintigraphy, and TS-pair, previous and current CTs and TS. The readers assigned likelihood levels to suspected bone metastases for diagnosis. Sensitivity, number of false positives per patient (FPP), and reading time for each pair of examinations were analysed for evaluating observer performance by performing the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Figure-of-merit (FOM) was calculated using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results:
The sensitivity of TS was significantly higher than that of bone scintigraphy (54.3% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.006). FPP with TS was significantly higher than that with bone scintigraphy (0.189 vs. 0.0722, p = 0.003). FOM of TS tended to be better than that of bone scintigraphy (0.742 vs. 0.691, p = 0.070).
Conclusion:
Sensitivity of TS in detecting bone metastasis was significantly higher than that of bone scintigraphy, but still limited to 54%. TS might be superior to bone scintigraphy for early detection of bone metastasis.
Key Points:
• Computed tomography temporal subtraction was helpful in early detection of bone metastases. • Sensitivity for bone metastasis was higher for computed tomography temporal subtraction than for bone scintigraphy. • Figure-of-merit of computed tomography temporal subtraction was better than that of bone scintigraphy.
More Related Videos
08:04Monitoring Tumor Metastases and Osteolytic Lesions with Bioluminescence and Micro CT Imaging
Published on: April 14, 2011
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
02:26Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
01:09Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
02:24Comparative Excretory Systems