Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

06:48
Assessing Intertidal Populations of the Invasive European Green Crab
Published on: September 16, 2020
6.5K
Why do shore crabs not prefer the most profitable mussels?
Isabel M Smallegange1, Jaap Van Der Meer1
1Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), PO Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, the Netherlands.
The Journal of Animal Ecology
|March 22, 2019
Summary
Shore crabs (Carcinus maenas L.) select smaller mussels than optimal to avoid damaging their claws. This prey size selection prioritizes claw integrity over maximizing energy intake, impacting their fitness.
Area of Science:
- Marine Biology
- Animal Behavior
- Ecology
Background:
- Shore crabs (Carcinus maenas L.) exhibit complex prey selection behaviors.
- Understanding the factors influencing prey size selection is crucial for marine predator-prey dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between handling time, feeding techniques, prey profitability, and bivalve prey size selection in shore crabs.
- To determine the constraints influencing prey selection in Carcinus maenas L.
Main Methods:
- Prey size was quantified as the ratio between mussel width and major chela length (MW:MCL).
- Prey profitability was standardized to the ratio between prey mass eaten per unit breaking time and predator mass (1/h Tb).
- Crabs were observed using either a crushing or a cutter feeding technique, with technique switching analyzed against prey size and profitability.
Main Results:
- Shore crabs employed a cutter technique for larger mussels (MW:MCL ratio > 0.24), coinciding with maximal prey profitability.
- When offered a range of prey sizes, crabs selected a smaller MW:MCL ratio (0.14-0.16) than the predicted optimal ratio (0.16-0.22).
- Crabs preferred smaller, crushable mussels (MW:MCL ratio 0.16) over larger, more profitable ones (0.24) in dichotomous choices.
Conclusions:
- Shore crabs prioritize minimizing claw wear and tear by selecting smaller, crushable mussels over larger, more profitable ones.
- The risk of claw damage significantly influences prey selection, potentially overriding energy maximization strategies.
- Claw integrity is critical for mating success and individual fitness in shore crabs, shaping foraging decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
521
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
521
Keystone Species
24.6K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
24.6K
Factorial Design
13.8K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.8K
In- and Out-Groups
43.7K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
43.7K
Confirmation Biases
8.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.2K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
44.6K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
44.6K

