Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Education in microscopy: taking a closer look with Jennifer Waters.

BioTechniques·2023

Same author

Towards effective adoption of novel image analysis methods.

Nature methods·2023

Same author

Phototoxicity in live fluorescence microscopy, and how to avoid it.

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2017

Same author

Navigating challenges in the application of superresolution microscopy.

The Journal of cell biology·2016

Same journal

A pan-vertebrate signaling motif controls the molecular function of intracellular AQP12.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

Same journal

Synergistic assembly, disassembly, and protection of complex forms of bundled F-actin.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

Same journal

Recruitment and release of XPG during NER is controlled by pre- and post-incision factors and EXO1.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

Same journal

Meiotic CENP-C supports centromere assembly and kinetochore recruitment in spermatogenesis.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

Same journal

Phosphatidylserine and RhoB connect PI4P and PA metabolism to maintain plasma membrane identity.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

Same journal

PIKfyve influences inter-organelle contacts with lysosomes to modulate the endoplasmic reticulum.

The Journal of cell biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

Designing a rigorous microscopy experiment: Validating methods and avoiding bias.

Anna Payne-Tobin Jost¹, Jennifer C Waters¹

¹Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

The Journal of Cell Biology

|March 22, 2019

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Microscopy images can be misleading due to experimental errors and human bias. This review outlines methods for rigorous light microscopy experiments to ensure accurate biological imaging and reproducible data.

More Related Videos

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Published on: April 6, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Published on: April 6, 2015

Area of Science:

Microscopy
Image Analysis
Biological Imaging

Background:

Microscope images are imperfect representations of biological specimens.
Experimental errors and specimen preparation can introduce artifacts.
Human cognitive biases affect image interpretation, potentially leading to false conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

To review critical aspects of designing rigorous light microscopy experiments.
To highlight strategies for mitigating errors and biases in imaging.
To improve the reliability and reproducibility of microscopy data.

Main Methods:

Validation of sample preparation techniques.
Assessment of imaging system performance.
Identification and correction of image artifacts.
Strategies for unbiased image acquisition and analysis.

Main Results:

Experimental errors and biases can lead to misinterpretation of microscopy data.
Rigorous experimental design is crucial for accurate biological imaging.
Systematic approaches are needed to address artifacts and cognitive biases.

Conclusions:

Implementing validated methods and error correction is essential for reliable microscopy.
Awareness and mitigation of biases are key to reproducible imaging research.
This review provides a framework for enhancing the integrity of light microscopy studies.