Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.8K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.0K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.0K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
2.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Last Matter: How do I create better MCQs?

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2021
Same author

Moving out of disciplinary silos - Integration of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2021
Same author

Recommendations for integration of foundational and clinical sciences throughout the pharmacy curriculum.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2020
Same author

Improving and Restoring the Well-being and Resilience of Pharmacy Students during a Pandemic.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2020
Same author

An initial environmental scan of APPE readiness assessment.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2020
Same author

In the midst of curricular revision, remember the importance of over-the-counter and self-care education.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2020
Same journal

Response to "Using the ACCP Toolkit to evolve the PharmD curriculum".

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same journal

Response to Johnson & Smith, Jozefczyk, and Posen et al. Regarding "Stop Pressuring Pharmacy Residents to be Licensed by July 1".

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same journal

Influence of Board-Certified Preceptors on Pharmacy Students' Intention to Pursue Specialty Certification.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same journal

FLEXIBLE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN PHARMACY ACADEMIA - AN OVERDUE IMPERATIVE.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same journal

Vocational Health Students Shaping Interprofessional Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study in Community-Based Education.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same journal

Simulated Live Interpreter-Patient Encounters: Impact on Pharmacy Students' Communication Skills and Confidence.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.1K

Lessons Learned from Evaluating a Process for Systematic Curriculum Review.

Jennifer Kirwin1, Danielle M Miller1, Margarita DiVall1,2

  • 1Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
|March 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study improved a systematic curriculum review process, leading to significant course enhancements and updated curricular mapping. The revised process is adaptable for other institutions seeking continuous curriculum assessment.

Keywords:
curriculum reviewprogrammatic assessmentquality improvementsyllabus

More Related Videos

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
07:36

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Published on: March 12, 2018

10.7K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

791

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.1K
Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
07:36

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Published on: March 12, 2018

10.7K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

791

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacy Education
  • Curriculum Development
  • Educational Assessment

Background:

  • Continuous assessment and improvement are vital for effective pharmacy curricula.
  • A systematic curriculum review process was established to meet this need.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an existing systematic curriculum review process.
  • To identify and implement improvements based on feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Collected data via curriculum committee experience and anonymous web-based surveys.
  • Surveyed pharmacy school instructors and curriculum committee members.

Main Results:

  • 72% of participants reported course changes following systematic review.
  • Key changes included programmatic outcomes, assessment strategies, and content.
  • Revisions to the review process included adjusted frequency, expanded course inclusion, and streamlined logistics.

Conclusions:

  • The systematic curriculum review process successfully drove course improvements and maintained current curricular mapping.
  • The process proved valuable for self-study preparation and is transferable to other institutions.