Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing PSC-to-Functional Cell Differentiation Using ML Models Based on Live-Cell Bright-Field Imaging
Published on: October 4, 2024
Accuracy of deep learning to differentiate the histopathological grading of meningiomas on MR images: A preliminary
Tommaso Banzato1, Francesco Causin2, Alessandro Della Puppa3
1Department of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Italy.
Background:
Grading of meningiomas is important in the choice of the most effective treatment for each patient.
Purpose:
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) in the differentiation of the histopathological grading of meningiomas from MR images.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Population:
In all, 117 meningioma-affected patients, 79 World Health Organization [WHO] Grade I, 32 WHO Grade II, and 6 WHO Grade III.
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5 T, 3.0 T postcontrast enhanced T1 W (PCT1 W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (b values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 ).
Assessment:
WHO Grade II and WHO Grade III meningiomas were considered a single category. The diagnostic accuracy of the pretrained Inception-V3 and AlexNet DCNNs was tested on ADC maps and PCT1 W images separately. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to asses DCNN performance.
Statistical Test:
Leave-one-out cross-validation.
Results:
The application of the Inception-V3 DCNN on ADC maps provided the best diagnostic accuracy results, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98). Remarkably, only 1/38 WHO Grade II-III and 7/79 WHO Grade I lesions were misclassified by this model. The application of AlexNet on ADC maps had a low discriminating accuracy, with an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76) and a high misclassification rate on both WHO Grade I and WHO Grade II-III cases. The discriminating accuracy of both DCNNs on postcontrast T1 W images was low, with Inception-V3 displaying an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76) and AlexNet displaying an AUC of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.45-0.64).
Data Conclusion:
DCNNs can accurately discriminate between benign and atypical/anaplastic meningiomas from ADC maps but not from PCT1 W images.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1152-1159.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Accuracy and Precision
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...

