Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

P50 Sensory Gating in Infants
Published on: December 26, 2013
Continuing major inconsistencies in the classification of unexpected infant deaths
Roger W Byard1, Rebecca A Shipstone2, Jeanine Young2
1School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide and Forensic Science SA, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Insights
Inconsistent classification of unexpected infant deaths, including sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), hinders accurate diagnosis. Clarifying definitions and using algorithms could improve distinctions between SIDS and other causes like suffocation.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Pathology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Classification of unexpected infant deaths is inconsistent among pathologists and researchers.
- Current definitions, like the San Diego definition of SIDS, are not consistently applied.
- Various terms such as SIDS, accidental suffocation, USID, and SUDI are used, leading to confusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current challenges in classifying unexpected infant deaths.
- To highlight the need for clearer definitions and diagnostic criteria.
- To explore potential improvements in differentiating SIDS from other causes of infant mortality.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and classification systems for unexpected infant deaths.
- Analysis of inconsistencies in the application of definitions like the San Diego SIDS definition.
- Discussion of the impact of lacking diagnostic pathological markers.
Main Results:
- Pathological markers for definitively diagnosing SIDS are absent.
- Conflicting classification systems contribute to idiosyncratic certification practices.
- Inconsistent application of definitions leads to variability in death certification.
Conclusions:
- Clarifying 'mechanical asphyxia not determined with certainty' may help differentiate SIDS from USID.
- Implementing a classification algorithm could better define unsafe sleep factors and suffocation.
- Improved diagnostic criteria and consistent application are crucial for accurate infant death classification.
Abstract:
The classification of the cause of unexpected infant deaths by both pathologists and researchers may be quite inconsistent. For example, if an infant is found lying face down on soft bedding the death may still be certified as 'sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)', 'accidental suffocation', 'undetermined', 'unclassified sudden infant death (USID)', or 'sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI)'. As the San Diego definition of SIDS does not appear to be rigorously or consistently applied, clarifying 'mechanical asphyxia not determined with certainty' may help to more clearly separate SIDS from USID. Including a classification algorithm with the definition may also help to better define unsafe sleep factors and suffocation. This commentary reviews the current situation with regard to classifying these deaths and concludes that the absence of diagnostic pathological markers with conflicting classification systems has led to idiosyncratic certification practices.
Related Concept Videos
Major Organs of the Digestive System
Gastrointestinal tract:
Major Losses in Pipes
Fluid flow can be classified as laminar or turbulent, primarily based on the Reynolds number. This dimensionless number reflects the relative influence of inertial to viscous...
Major Hormones and Their Functions
Oxytocin, produced in the hypothalamus and released by the pituitary gland, plays a role in social bonding, childbirth, and...
Classification of Neurotransmitters
Classification of Leukocytes
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...

