Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

A Patient-Derived Xenograft Model for Venous Malformation
Published on: June 15, 2020
Can fecal continence be predicted in patients born with anorectal malformations?
Peter C Minneci1, Rashmi S Kabre2, Grace Z Mak3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery and the Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Insights
Anorectal malformations (ARM) subtypes, not spinal anomalies, predict fecal continence in children. Even mild ARM types show high incontinence rates, necessitating long-term management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Anorectal malformations (ARM) represent a spectrum of congenital anomalies affecting the terminal part of the gastrointestinal tract.
- Achieving fecal continence is a significant challenge for children with ARM, impacting their quality of life.
- Predicting the likelihood of fecal continence at birth remains difficult due to the complexity of ARM and associated factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictive factors for achieving fecal continence in children diagnosed with anorectal malformations (ARM).
- To analyze the association between birth-related factors, including ARM subtype and spinal/sacral imaging, and long-term fecal continence outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A multi-institutional prospective cohort study involving children born with ARM between 2007-2011.
- Fecal continence was assessed using the Baylor Social Continence Scale in children aged 4 years or older.
- Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of continence based on factors present at birth.
Main Results:
- Of 144 ARM patients (median age 7 years), 58 (40%) achieved fecal continence.
- Continence rates varied significantly by ARM subtype (p = 0.002), with the highest rate (60%) observed in patients with a perineal fistula.
- Less severe ARM subtypes (e.g., perineal fistula, recto-vestibular fistula) were strongly associated with higher odds of continence (OR = 7.4, p = 0.001).
- Spinal anomalies and the lateral sacral ratio did not show a significant association with fecal continence.
Conclusions:
- The specific subtype of anorectal malformation (ARM) is the primary predictor of fecal continence in affected children.
- The substantial rates of incontinence, even in less severe ARM subtypes, underscore the difficulty in predicting continence at birth.
- Long-term follow-up and dedicated bowel management programs are crucial for children with ARM to optimize continence outcomes.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with attaining fecal continence in children with anorectal malformations (ARM).
Methods:
We performed a multi-institutional cohort study of children born with ARM in 2007-2011 who had spinal and sacral imaging. Questions from the Baylor Social Continence Scale were used to assess fecal continence at the age of ≥4 years. Factors present at birth that predicted continence were identified using multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
Among 144 ARM patients with a median age of 7 years (IQR 6-8), 58 (40%) were continent. The rate of fecal continence varied by ARM subtype (p = 0.002) with the highest rate of continence in patients with perineal fistula (60%). Spinal anomalies and the lateral sacral ratio were not associated with continence. On multivariable analysis, patients with less severe ARM subtypes (perineal fistula, recto-bulbar fistula, recto-vestibular fistula, no fistula, rectal stenosis) were more likely to be continent (OR = 7.4, p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Type of ARM was the only factor that predicted fecal continence in children with ARM. The high degree of incontinence, even in the least severe subtypes, highlights that predicting fecal continence is difficult at birth and supports the need for long-term follow-up and bowel management programs for children with ARM.
Type Of Study:
Prospective Cohort Study.
Level Of Evidence:
II.
Related Concept Videos
The Born-Haber Cycle
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

