Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

The Role of Fabric in Frictional Properties of Phyllosilicate-Rich Tectonic Faults
Published on: November 6, 2021
Clock advance and magnitude limitation through fault interaction: the case of the 2016 central Italy earthquake
Nicola Alessandro Pino1, Vincenzo Convertito2, Raul Madariaga3
1Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Via Diocleziano, 328, 80134, Naples, Italy. alessandro.pino@ingv.it.
Abstract:
Faults communicate with each other. Strong earthquakes perturb stress over large volumes modifying the load on nearby faults and their resistance to slip. The causative fault induces permanent or transient perturbations that can change the time to the next seismic rupture with respect to that expected for a steadily accumulating stress. For a given fault, an increase of stress or a strength decrease would drive it closer to - or maybe even trigger - an earthquake. This is usually perceived as an undesired circumstance. However, with respect to the potential damage, a time advance might not necessarily be a bad thing. Here we show that the central Italy seismic sequence starting with the Amatrice earthquake on 24 August 2016 advanced the 30 October Norcia earthquake (MW = 6.5), but limited its magnitude by inhibiting the rupture on large portions of the fault plane. The preceding events hastened the mainshock and determined its features by shaping a patch of concentrated stress. During the Norcia earthquake, the coseismic slip remained substantially confined to this patch. Our results demonstrate that monitoring the seismicity with very dense networks and timely analyses can make it feasible to map rupture prone areas.
Related Concept Videos
Central Limit Theorem
The sample size, n, that...
Orders of Magnitude
The order of magnitude is simply a way of rounding numbers consistently to the nearest power of 10. This makes doing rough mental math...
Fault Types
For line-to-line faults occurring between phases B and C, the...
Limiting Reactant
Measures of Central Tendency
The Central Dogma

