Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

10.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

354
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

11.8K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular dynamics with rigid bodies: Alternative formulation and assessment of its limitations when employed to simulate liquid water.

The Journal of chemical physics·2017
Same journal

A data-driven modeling study on the accurate identification of Doppler-free saturated absorption spectra in diatomic tellurium (130Te2).

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Anharmonic phonons via quantum thermal bath simulations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantum simulation of alignment dependent differential cross sections in co-propagating molecular beams at cold collision energies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Non-additive ion effects on the coil-globule equilibrium of a generic polymer in aqueous salt solutions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Insights into the unexpected small reduction of the temperature of maximum density of water by lithium chloride addition.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Optical frequency comb double-resonance spectroscopy of the 9030-9175 cm-1 states of ethylene.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.0K

Refinement of thermostated molecular dynamics using backward error analysis.

Ana J Silveira1, Charlles R A Abreu2

  • 1Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química, PLAPIQUI, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Camino La Carrindanga Km 7-CC: 717, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|March 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Numerical methods for molecular dynamics can have errors. This study introduces a refined energy calculation to improve accuracy, successfully mitigating errors in liquid water simulations up to 5 fs time steps.

More Related Videos

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.2K
High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.0K
Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.2K
High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular dynamics simulations
  • Statistical mechanics

Background:

  • Kinetic energy equipartition is crucial for molecular dynamics (MD) methods aiming to sample canonical ensembles.
  • Numerical integration in MD can introduce discretization errors, causing deviations from ideal equipartition.
  • Backward error analysis offers a way to estimate the true quantity undergoing equipartition via a shadow Hamiltonian.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address discretization errors in molecular dynamics simulations.
  • To develop a method for obtaining higher-order estimates of kinetic and potential energies.
  • To improve the accuracy of canonical ensemble sampling in MD.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing backward error analysis to derive refined kinetic and potential energies.
  • Estimating the shadow Hamiltonian using the sum of refined energies.
  • Tuning the thermostatting procedure with the refined kinetic energy.
  • Applying the method to liquid water modeled as a rigid body.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method yields refined energy estimates with minimal computational overhead.
  • The refined kinetic energy, when used in thermostatting, reproduces a canonical ensemble compatible with the refined system.
  • Discretization effects on equilibrium properties of liquid water were mitigated for time steps up to 5 fs.
  • Canonical averages for the original system can be recovered through reweighting.

Conclusions:

  • The developed approach effectively mitigates discretization errors in molecular dynamics.
  • Refined energy calculations improve the accuracy of canonical ensemble sampling.
  • This method enhances the reliability of MD simulations, particularly for systems like liquid water with large time steps.