Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
Published on: April 15, 2020
Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional
Robert Herber1, Lisa Ramm1, Eberhard Spoerl1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany.
Purpose:
To investigate corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using the Ocular Response Analyzer dynamic bidirectional applanation device (ORA) and the Corvis ST dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (CST).
Setting:
Department of Ophthalmology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital Dresden, Germany.
Design:
Prospective, monocentric, case-control study.
Methods:
Corneal biomechanical parameters were obtained in 60 eyes of 60 healthy participants (Group I) and 60 eyes of 60 keratoconus patients (Group II) with different grades of severity using the ORA and the CST. Participants were matched by age (Group I: 38.3 years ± 12.8 [SD], Group II: 37.3 ± 11.2 years) and intraocular pressure (Group I: 13.7 ± 1.7 mm Hg, Group II: 13.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg).
Results:
For the ORA, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.950 for the keratoconus score, a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 93%. The AUC for the corneal resistant factor and corneal hysteresis was 0.930 and 0.868 with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 87%, and sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 80%, respectively. For the CST, the corneal biomechanical index showed the highest AUC (0.977) with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98%. The AUC of integrated radius (0.974; 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity) was followed by maximum inverse radius (0.962; 92% sensitivity, 93% specificity). Most parameters were able to discriminate healthy eyes from different keratoconus stages and early stages of keratoconus from moderate stages.
Conclusion:
Both devices allowed for good differentiation between healthy eyes and keratoconic eyes and between different severity grades of keratoconus. Several parameters of ORA and CST revealed high sensitivity and specificity values for keratoconus detection.
Related Concept Videos
02:20Dynamic Equilibrium
01:08Equation of Rotational Dynamics
01:12Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...
01:30Dynamics of Circular Motion
Any acceleration must be produced by some force. Therefore, any force or combination of forces can cause centripetal acceleration. A few examples include the tension in the rope on a...
01:16Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
01:19Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...