Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
Published on: September 27, 2019
Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and
Sean M Bittner1, Brandon T Smith2, Luis Diaz-Gomez1
1Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Biomaterials Lab, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA; NIH/NIBIB Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, USA.
Abstract:
Recent developments in 3D printing (3DP) research have led to a variety of scaffold designs and techniques for osteochondral tissue engineering; however, the simultaneous incorporation of multiple types of gradients within the same construct remains a challenge. Herein, we describe the fabrication and mechanical characterization of porous poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and PCL-hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds with incorporated vertical porosity and ceramic content gradients via a multimaterial extrusion 3DP system. Scaffolds of 0 wt% HA (PCL), 15 wt% HA (HA15), or 30 wt% HA (HA30) were fabricated with uniform composition and porosity (using 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, or 0.9 mm on-center fiber spacing), uniform composition and gradient porosity, and gradient composition (PCL-HA15-HA30) and porosity. Micro-CT imaging and porosity analysis demonstrated the ability to incorporate both vertical porosity and pore size gradients and a ceramic gradient, which collectively recapitulate gradients found in native osteochondral tissues. Uniaxial compression testing demonstrated an inverse relationship between porosity, ϕ, and compressive modulus, E, and yield stress, σy, for uniform porosity scaffolds, however, no differences were observed as a result of ceramic incorporation. All scaffolds demonstrated compressive moduli within the appropriate range for trabecular bone, with average moduli between 86 ± 14-220 ± 26 MPa. Uniform porosity and pore size scaffolds for all ceramic levels had compressive moduli between 205 ± 37-220 ± 26 MPa, 112 ± 13-118 ± 23 MPa, and 86 ± 14-97 ± 8 MPa respectively for porosities ranging between 14 ± 4-20 ± 6%, 36 ± 3-43 ± 4%, and 54 ± 2-57 ± 2%, with the moduli and yield stresses of low porosity scaffolds being significantly greater (p < 0.05) than those of all other groups. Single (porosity) gradient and dual (composition/porosity) gradient scaffolds demonstrated compressive properties similar (p > 0.05) to those of the highest porosity uniform scaffolds (porosity gradient scaffolds 98 ± 23-107 ± 6 MPa, and 102 ± 7 MPa for dual composition/porosity gradient scaffolds), indicating that these properties are more heavily influenced by the weakest section of the gradient. The compression data for uniform scaffolds were also readily modeled, yielding scaling laws of the form E ∼ (1 - ϕ)1.27 and σy ∼ (1 - ϕ)1.37, which demonstrated that the compressive properties evaluated in this study were well-aligned with expectations from previous literature and were readily modeled with good fidelity independent of polymer scaffold geometry and ceramic content. All uniform scaffolds were similarly deformed and recovered despite different porosities, while the large-pore sections of porosity gradient scaffolds were significantly more deformed than all other groups, indicating that porosity may not be an independent factor in determining strain recovery. Moving forward, the technique described here will serve as the template for more complex multimaterial constructs with bioactive cues that better match native tissue physiology and promote tissue regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This manuscript describes the fabrication and mechanical characterization of "dual" porosity/ceramic content gradient scaffolds produced via a multimaterial extrusion 3D printing system for osteochondral tissue engineering. Such scaffolds are designed to better address the simultaneous gradients in architecture and mineralization found in native osteochondral tissue. The results of this study demonstrate that this technique may serve as a template for future advances in 3D printing technology that may better address the inherent complexity in such heterogeneous tissues.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Cells and Tissue
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the...
Hormones and Bone Tissue
Hormones That Influence Osteoblasts and/or Maintain the Matrix
Several hormones are necessary for controlling bone growth and maintaining the bone matrix. The pituitary gland secretes growth hormone (GH), which, as its name implies, controls bone growth. This happens in several ways: first, it triggers chondrocyte...
What is an Electrochemical Gradient?
The chemical gradient relies on differences in the abundance of a substance on the outside versus the inside of a cell and flows from areas of high to low ion concentration. In contrast, the electrical gradient revolves around an...
Uniform Distribution
Two essential properties of this distribution are
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Bone as Supporting Connective Tissue
Bone Matrix
Bone, or osseous tissue, is a connective tissue that has a large amount of two different types of matrix material. The organic matrix is similar to the matrix material found in other connective tissues, including some amount of collagen and elastic fibers. This gives strength and flexibility to the tissue. The inorganic matrix consists of mineral salts— mostly calcium salts—...

