Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

47.8K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.8K
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

1.9K
Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...
1.9K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.2K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.6K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.4K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.4K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Construction and internal-external validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for multidrug resistance in ICU patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Exploring the mechanism of Bazheng San on rats with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) based on TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

Structural elucidation of an amylopectin from Astragalus membranaceus by integrating selective and quantitative NMR spectra with database matching.

Carbohydrate polymers·2026
Same author

Drug repurposing and AI-driven discovery of tyrosinase inhibitors, emerging strategies for skin disorders: A review.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2025
Same author

Plasticity-based design and static performance of UT-type joint for construction error adaptation.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

$C^{2}D$C2D: Context-Aware Concept Decomposition for Personalized Text-to-Image Synthesis.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

10.7K

Brain Differences Between Men and Women: Evidence From Deep Learning.

Jiang Xin1, Yaoxue Zhang1, Yan Tang1,2

  • 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|March 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study used a novel 3D deep learning method to analyze brain images of men and women. The findings reveal significant gender-related brain structure differences, supporting sex as a crucial biological variable in neuroscience research.

Keywords:
deep learningdiffusion MRIentropygender differenceneural network

More Related Videos

Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus
09:46

Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus

Published on: March 8, 2015

11.4K
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

10.7K
Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus
09:46

Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus

Published on: March 8, 2015

11.4K
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Previous neuroimaging studies on sex differences in brain morphology have yielded conflicting results.
  • Existing methods often focus on specific brain regions, limiting a comprehensive understanding of whole-brain differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential structural differences between male and female brains using a novel deep learning approach.
  • To apply advanced neuroimaging analysis to a large dataset of diffusion MRI scans from healthy young adults.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large, open-access diffusion MRI database comprising 1,065 healthy subjects (490 men, 575 women).
  • Developed and applied a novel 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to analyze fractional anisotropy (FA) maps.
  • Compared the 3D CNN performance against Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS).

Main Results:

  • The 3D CNN achieved a high classification accuracy of 93.3% for gender identification from whole-brain FA images, outperforming SVM (78.2%).
  • Significant gender-related differences were identified in specific gray matter regions (e.g., left precuneus, left cingulate gyrus) and white matter tracts (e.g., genu of corpus callosum, middle cerebellum peduncle).
  • Entropy analysis of image features indicated differences in brain structure complexity between sexes.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides compelling evidence for structural brain differences between men and women, detectable using advanced deep learning techniques.
  • These findings underscore the importance of considering sex as a biological variable in brain research and neuroimaging studies.
  • The developed 3D CNN method offers a promising tool for analyzing neuroimaging data and identifying subtle structural variations.