Bronchiectasis insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?
Mark Metersky1, James Chalmers2
1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
F1000Research
|March 26, 2019
Summary
Bronchiectasis treatment lacks FDA-approved options due to low-quality evidence and trial failures. This commentary explores reasons for disappointing results and proposes a new approach for evidence-based bronchiectasis therapies.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Bronchiectasis is a growing respiratory condition impacting patient quality of life and increasing morbidity.
- The disease is highly heterogeneous, with diverse causes and clinical presentations.
- Current treatments for bronchiectasis are supported by limited evidence, leading to a lack of regulatory approval.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the reasons behind the failure of recent clinical trials for bronchiectasis treatments.
- To propose a novel strategy for developing evidence-based therapies for bronchiectasis.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent clinical trial outcomes in bronchiectasis.
- Analysis of factors contributing to treatment efficacy failures.
- Discussion of potential methodological improvements for future research.
Main Results:
- Investigational agents have consistently failed to show statistically or clinically significant benefits.
- Existing treatment strategies are based on low-quality evidence, hindering therapeutic advancements.
Conclusions:
- Heterogeneity of bronchiectasis may confound trial results.
- A refined research approach is needed to identify effective, evidence-based treatments for this complex disease.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Expected Value
7.4K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.4K
01:08Determination of Expected Frequency
2.6K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.6K
01:19Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
7.2K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.2K
01:42Schemas
12.3K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.3K
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
01:49Probability Laws
44.0K
Overview
44.0K