Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Indicators02:39

Indicators

60.0K
Certain organic substances change color in dilute solution when the hydronium ion concentration reaches a particular value. For example, phenolphthalein is a colorless substance in any aqueous solution with a hydronium ion concentration greater than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH < 8.3). In more basic solutions where the hydronium ion concentration is less than 5.0 × 10−9 M (pH > 8.3), it is red or pink. Substances such as phenolphthalein, which can be used to determine the pH of a solution, are...
60.0K
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

330
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
330
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

523
Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
523
Performing a Simple Data Analysis using MS-Excel Function01:17

Performing a Simple Data Analysis using MS-Excel Function

940
Microsoft Excel offers a suite of functions and tools ideal for statistical analysis, making it accessible to students and researchers. This article outlines fundamental Excel functions pivotal for data analysis.
SUM: This function calculates the total sum of a range of values. It's the foundation for aggregating data, essential for determining overall trends and totals in datasets.
AVERAGE: It computes the mean value of a given set of numbers, providing a quick insight into the central...
940
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.9K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.9K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports.

Scientometrics·2018
Same author

Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers.

PloS one·2016
Same author

Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study.

Scientometrics·2016
Same author

[Distribution of medical research support: men without contacts are treated unfairly].

Lakartidningen·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.6K

Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator.

Peter van den Besselaar1, Ulf Sandström2

  • 1Network Institute and Department of Organization Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|March 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bibliometric indicators often overlook researcher independence, a key quality dimension. This study introduces new indicators to measure collaboration and thematic independence, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of scholarly quality beyond productivity and impact.

More Related Videos

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

904
Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis
14:48

Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis

Published on: May 8, 2021

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.6K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

904
Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis
14:48

Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis

Published on: May 8, 2021

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientometrics
  • Research Evaluation

Background:

  • Bibliometric indicators are widely used for evaluating individual scientists.
  • Current indicators primarily focus on productivity and impact, neglecting other crucial quality dimensions.
  • Research quality encompasses more than just output and citation counts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of existing bibliometric indicators by developing measures for underrepresented quality dimensions.
  • Specifically, to introduce novel indicators for assessing an individual researcher's independence.
  • To enhance the comprehensive evaluation of scholarly quality.

Main Methods:

  • Development of indicators to measure different facets of researcher independence.
  • Two indicators focus on the researcher's collaboration network.
  • Two indicators assess the researcher's thematic independence.
  • These indicators are combined to form a composite independence indicator.

Main Results:

  • The proposed independence indicators can differentiate between researchers with similar productivity and impact.
  • The indicators capture distinct aspects of a researcher's autonomy and network development.
  • Demonstrated the utility of the independence indicator in nuanced research assessment.

Conclusions:

  • The developed independence indicator represents a significant advancement in evaluating individual scholarly quality.
  • This indicator provides a more holistic assessment of a researcher's standing beyond traditional metrics.
  • Encourages the adoption of more comprehensive bibliometric tools for research evaluation.