Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
[Efficacy of laboratory methods of diagnostic of purulent bacterial meningitis.]
A N Oganesyan1, E A Voropaeva1, A A Mel'nikova2
1Federal State Institution of Science «Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of epidemiology and Microbiology», of Federal Service of Surveillance on Consumer' Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing.
Abstract:
According to the World Health Organization, every year about 1 million cases of purulent bacterial meningitis (PBM) are registered in the world, of which 200 thousand cases end in death. Bacterial meningitis is polyethiologic, which makes the task of determining the pathogen the main in the organization of epidemiological surveillance, treatment regimens, planning of preventive and anti-epidemic measures. The quality of laboratory diagnostics has a key influence on this. The true incidence of meningitis of different etiology can be altered at low-efficiency laboratory diagnostics. This work was carried out to assess the effectiveness of existing laboratory methods for the detection of PBM pathogens: Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis; as a part of the programme on sentinel surveillance of invasive bacterial diseases (IBD) carried out by the WHO regional office for Europe in a number of countries in Europe (Ukraine, Belarus), Transcaucasia (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia), Asia (Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan) in the period 2010-2017. 2893 samples of clinical material (CSF and blood) obtained from patients with the meningeal syndrome were studied by four diagnostic methods: cultural method, latex-agglutination test, immunochromatographic test (BinaxNOW), PCR (conventional and real-time), used to identify the following pathogens: Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae. When identifying the causative agents of BM, PCR more effective than culture method is 5 times in detecting N. meningitidis; 3 times in the detection of S. pneumoniae; 4 times the detection of H. influenzae b. Latex-agglutination test and immunochromatographic test allow to increase the identification of pathogens of BM for N. meningitidis - by 35.6%; S. pneumoniae - by 67%; H. influenzae b - by 19.2%, it is possible to set them in the field and at the epidpoint if necessary. When working with clinical material from patients diagnosed with GBM, it is advisable for bacteriological laboratories to complement the culture method of microbiological diagnosis of latex-agglutination test, immunochromatographic test or PCR.
Insights
This study compared laboratory methods for detecting bacterial meningitis pathogens. PCR and rapid tests significantly improve pathogen identification compared to traditional culture methods, aiding diagnosis and surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Technologies
Background:
- Purulent bacterial meningitis (PBM) causes ~1 million cases and 200,000 deaths globally each year.
- Accurate pathogen identification is crucial for effective PBM surveillance, treatment, and prevention.
- Laboratory diagnostic quality directly impacts the true incidence and understanding of meningitis etiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of various laboratory methods for detecting key PBM pathogens.
- To compare the performance of cultural methods, latex-agglutination, immunochromatographic tests, and PCR (polymerase chain reaction).
- To assess these methods within a WHO sentinel surveillance program for invasive bacterial diseases (IBD) across Europe, Transcaucasia, and Asia (2010-2017).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2893 clinical samples (CSF and blood) from patients with meningeal syndrome.
- Utilized four diagnostic techniques: cultural method, latex-agglutination test, immunochromatographic test (BinaxNOW), and PCR (conventional and real-time).
- Targeted pathogens included Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae.
Main Results:
- PCR demonstrated superior sensitivity: 5x for N. meningitidis, 3x for S. pneumoniae, and 4x for H. influenzae type b compared to culture.
- Latex-agglutination and immunochromatographic tests increased pathogen identification rates: 35.6% (N. meningitidis), 67% (S. pneumoniae), and 19.2% (H. influenzae b).
- Rapid tests are suitable for field and on-site epidemiological investigations.
Conclusions:
- PCR significantly enhances the detection of major bacterial meningitis pathogens over traditional culture methods.
- Rapid diagnostic tests (latex-agglutination, immunochromatographic) are valuable adjuncts, improving overall pathogen yield.
- Bacteriological laboratories should consider supplementing culture methods with PCR or rapid tests for improved PBM diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Cranial and Spinal Meninges
Cranial Meninges
These meningeal layers cover the cranium. The dura mater is the outermost layer of cranial meninges. It is a thick and durable membrane of dense...
Self-Efficacy
Bacterial Transformation
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...
Bacterial Signaling
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Bacterial RNA Polymerase
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...

