Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Collaborative care intervention for patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiaoting Cui1, Wenyi Dong2, Hongxiao Zheng1
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing He Ping Li Hospital.
Insights
Collaborative care intervention significantly improves quality of life, anxiety, and physical function in chronic heart failure patients. Face-to-face interventions offer greater quality of life benefits than telephone-only approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Psychosocial Care
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (HF) significantly impairs patients' quality of life (QoL) due to persistent symptoms.
- Collaborative care intervention (CCI) integrates psychosocial and palliative strategies into chronic care to enhance QoL and manage symptoms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative care intervention (CCI) in improving QoL and other health outcomes for patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies involving 2999 patients with chronic heart failure.
- Searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to September 2018.
- Pooled data using standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) via fixed- and random-effects models.
Main Results:
- CCI significantly improved QoL in HF patients compared to routine care (SMD = 0.60).
- Face-to-face interventions demonstrated a greater QoL improvement (SMD = 0.54) than telephone-only interventions.
- CCI also led to significant improvements in anxiety levels (SMD = 0.33) and the 6-minute walk test (SMD = 0.46).
Conclusions:
- Collaborative care intervention is effective in enhancing QoL, psychological well-being (anxiety), and physical function (6-min walk test) in chronic heart failure patients.
- Face-to-face CCI modalities yield superior QoL improvements compared to telephone-based interventions alone.
Introduction:
Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) show many symptoms that worsen the quality of life (QoL). Collaborative care intervention (CCI) aims to improve the QoL and symptoms by integrating psychosocial and palliative strategies in chronic care.
Methods:
The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched from inception to September 2018. The included studies were used to determine pooled standard mean differences (SMDs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were assessed by fixed- and random effects models, respectively.
Results:
Twenty-one studies including 2999 patients with chronic heart failure were included. The results showed significantly improved QoL in the CCI group compared with the routine care group (SMD = 0.60, 95%CI 0.27-0.94, Pheterogeneity < .001, I = 94.1%). The patients who received face-to-face interventions experienced a significant improvement (SMD = 0.54, 95%CI 0.24-0.85, Pheterogeneity < .001, I = 88.7%) in terms of QoL compared with those administered only telephone interventions. Furthermore, significantly improved anxiety level (SMD = 0.33, 95%CI 0.12-0.55, Pheterogeneity = .612, I = 0%) and 6-min walk test (SMD = 0.46, 95%CI 0.29-0.64, Pheterogeneity = .458, I = 0%) were found in the CCI group compared with the routine care group.
Conclusion:
These findings confirmed that collaborative care intervention effectively improves the quality of life as well as psychological (anxiety) and physical (6-min walk test) functions in patients with chronic heart failure compared with routine care. Furthermore, face-to-face interventions show a greater improvement of QoL compared with telephone-only interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Patient-centered Care

