Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Reporting of hypoglycaemia in clinical trials of basal insulins: A need for consensus
Brian M Frier1, Alexandria Ratzki-Leewing2, Stewart B Harris3
1British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract:
Hypoglycaemia is a common side-effect of diabetes therapies, particularly insulin, and imposes a substantial burden on individuals and healthcare systems. Consequently, regulatory approval of newer basal insulin (BI) therapies has relied on demonstration of a balance between achievement of good glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for assessing efficacy and safety, including hypoglycaemia risk, of BIs and are invaluable for obtaining regulatory approval. However, their highly selected patient populations and their conditions lead to results that may not be representative of real-life situations. Real-world evidence (RWE) studies are more representative of clinical practice, but they also have limitations. As such, data both from RCTs and RWE studies provide a fuller picture of the hypoglycaemia risk with BI therapies. However, substantial differences exist in the way hypoglycaemia is reported across these studies, which confounds comparisons of hypoglycaemia frequency among different BIs. This problem is ongoing and persists in recent trials of second-generation BI analogues. Although they provide a lower risk of hypoglycaemia when compared with earlier BIs, they do not eliminate it. This review describes differences in the way hypoglycaemia is reported across RCTs and RWE studies of second-generation BI analogues and examines potential reasons for these differences. For studies of BIs, there is a need to standardize aspects of design, analysis and methods of reporting to better enable interpretation of the efficacy and safety of such insulins among studies; such aspects include length of follow-up, glycaemic targets, hypoglycaemia definitions and time intervals for determining nocturnal events.
Insights
Hypoglycaemia, a common side effect of basal insulin (BI) therapies, presents challenges in diabetes management. Standardizing how hypoglycaemia is reported in clinical trials and real-world studies is crucial for accurately comparing BI safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Diabetes Mellitus Management
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Hypoglycaemia is a significant adverse event associated with diabetes therapies, particularly insulin.
- The burden of hypoglycaemia impacts patients and healthcare systems, necessitating careful risk-benefit assessments for new basal insulins (BIs).
- Regulatory approval for BIs often requires demonstrating a balance between glycemic control and reduced hypoglycaemia risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze the discrepancies in hypoglycaemia reporting across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies of second-generation BI analogues.
- To identify potential reasons for these reporting differences.
- To highlight the need for standardized reporting methods to facilitate accurate comparisons of BI safety and efficacy.
Main Methods:
- The review synthesizes data from published RCTs and RWE studies focusing on second-generation basal insulin analogues.
- It critically examines methodologies for defining, measuring, and reporting hypoglycaemic events in these diverse study designs.
- The analysis identifies variations in study duration, glycemic targets, hypoglycaemia definitions, and assessment intervals for nocturnal events.
Main Results:
- Substantial heterogeneity exists in the reporting of hypoglycaemia across RCTs and RWE studies involving BIs.
- These differences confound direct comparisons of hypoglycaemia incidence and severity between different BI therapies.
- Even newer second-generation BI analogues, while offering improved safety profiles, do not eliminate the risk of hypoglycaemia.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of study design, analysis, and reporting methods for hypoglycaemia in BI trials is urgently needed.
- Consistent definitions and reporting intervals are essential for accurate interpretation of BI efficacy and safety data.
- Improved standardization will enable better clinical decision-making and patient care in diabetes management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Laminins are the Adhesive Proteins of Basal Lamina
In humans, the five forms of alpha chains are LAMA 1, LAMA 2, LAMA 3, LAMA 4, and LAMA 5. The four forms of beta chains are LAMB 1, LAMB 2, LAMB 3, and LAMB 4. The three forms of gamma...
Basal Lamina are the Specialized Form of ECM
Proteins...

