Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
Published on: July 1, 2019
TMS motor mapping in brain tumor patients: more robust maps with an increased resting motor threshold
Steven Lam1, Giuseppe Lucente2,3, Heike Schneider1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Objective:
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has found widespread usage across many clinical centers as part of their surgical planning routines. NTMS offers a non-invasive approach to delineation of the motor cortex, in which the region is outlined through electromagnetic stimulation and electromyographic recordings of target muscles. Several neurophysiological parameters such as the motor evoked potential (MEP) and its derivatives, the resting motor threshold (RMT) and motor latency, are collected. The present study investigates the clinical feasibility and reproducibility of increasing the MEP threshold in brain tumor patients, with the goal to improve the robustness of the procedure.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-three subjects with peri-motor cortex tumors underwent motor mapping with nTMS. RMT was calculated with both conventional 50-μV and experimental 500-μV MEP amplitude thresholds. Motor mapping was performed with 105% of both RMTs stimulator intensity using the FDI as the target muscle.
Results:
Motor mapping was possible in 20 patients with both the conventional and experimental thresholds. No significant differences in area size were found between motor area maps generated with a conventional 50-μV threshold in comparison to those generated with the higher 500-μV threshold (50 μV 272.56 mm2 [170.47-434.31] vs. 500 μV 240.54 mm2 [169.77-362.84], P = 0.34). Latency time was significantly reduced in 500-μV recordings relative to 50-μV recordings (50 μV 23.38 ms [22.55-24.51] vs. 500 μV 22.57 ms [21.41-23.70], P < 0.001). Both electric field intensity (50 μV 63.81 V/m [54.26-76.11] vs. 500 μV 77.83 V/m [65.21-93.94], P < 0.001) and RMT (50 μV 33 MSO% [28-36] vs. 500 μV 39.5 MSO% [32-44], P < 0.001) were significantly greater with the higher 500-μV threshold.
Conclusions:
Our study demonstrates the feasibility of increasing the MEP detection threshold to 500 μV in brain tumor patients for RMT determination and motor area mapping with nTMS.
More Related Videos
13:12Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping
Published on: August 12, 2019
11:09Characterizing the Composition of Molecular Motors on Moving Axonal Cargo Using "Cargo Mapping" Analysis
Published on: October 30, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Motor Units
Motor Units
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
Microtubule Associated Proteins (MAPs)
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Direct Motor Pathways
The corticospinal tract is responsible for the voluntary movement of the limbs and trunk. It originates in the cerebral cortex of the brain and descends through the cerebrum's internal capsule and...