Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

04:58
Modeling Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in Zebrafish to Characterize the Impact of an Adverse Embryonic Environment on Adult Social Behavior
Published on: February 9, 2024
649
State-dependent foraging among social fish in a risky environment
Jesse Balaban-Feld1, William A Mitchell2, Burt P Kotler3
1Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, 8410501, Beer Sheva, Israel. jbalaba2@gmail.com.
Oecologia
|April 1, 2019
Summary
Underfed goldfish took more risks foraging near a predator, gaining more food without increased mortality. Energetic state significantly impacts social foraging behavior and group dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Ecology
- Animal Behavior
- Predator-Prey Dynamics
Background:
- Foraging in the presence of predators is risky.
- Social animals form groups for anti-predator benefits, but this increases conspicuousness.
- Individual energetic state influences risk-taking during foraging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how energetic state affects risk-taking in social foraging.
- To examine the trade-off between food acquisition and safety in goldfish groups.
- To understand the impact of individual energetic condition on group dynamics and predator-prey interactions.
Main Methods:
- Mixed groups of underfed and well-fed goldfish were exposed to an avian predator (little egret).
- Individual refuge use and foraging decisions were recorded.
- Predation success and foraging outcomes were analyzed in relation to fish energetic state and group size.
Main Results:
- Underfed goldfish engaged in riskier foraging, making more outings and emerging first from refuge.
- Underfed fish consumed more food but did not experience higher mortality rates.
- Predator attacks favored groups of three or more, and the initial emergent fish were safer.
Conclusions:
- Energetic condition is a key driver of individual risk-taking in social foraging.
- Differences in energetic state influence foraging success and group fission-fusion dynamics.
- Foraging in larger groups presents significant risks, despite collective anti-predator advantages.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
13.8K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.8K
Osmoregulation in Fishes
53.0K
When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?
53.0K
Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Proof
31.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.5K
Social Facilitation
36.1K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.1K
Social Loafing
39.0K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.0K

