Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fisher's Exact Test01:08

Fisher's Exact Test

1.2K
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of...
1.2K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.6K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.7K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Effective sample size for individual risk predictions: quantifying uncertainty in machine learning models.

The Lancet. Digital health·2025
Same author

Selective inference for fMRI cluster-wise analysis, issues, and recommendations for critical vector selection: A comment on Blain et al.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Can Molecular Breast Imaging With Tc-99m Sestamibi Safely Rule Out Malignancy in Pathologic Nipple Discharge?

Clinical nuclear medicine·2025
Same author

The AccelerAge framework: a new statistical approach to predict biological age based on time-to-event data.

European journal of epidemiology·2024
Same author

Cumulative incidence and risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastases in organ transplant recipients: The Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients in Europe-International Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative metastases study, a prospective multicenter study.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2024
Same journal

Ordinal pattern-based change point detection.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2025
Same journal

A generalized Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for a family of generalized linear models.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2024
Same journal

Power priors for replication studies.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2024
Same journal

Level sets of depth measures in abstract spaces.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2023
Same journal

Robust and efficient estimation of nonparametric generalized linear models.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2023
Same journal

Homogeneity tests for one-way models with dependent errors under correlated groups.

Test (Madrid, Spain)·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.4K

Exact testing with random permutations.

Jesse Hemerik1, Jelle Goeman1

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone S5-P, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

Test (Madrid, Spain)
|April 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study proves that random permutation tests can be exact, not just approximate. Our conditional Monte Carlo test framework validates exactness for permutation methods, benefiting multiple testing procedures.

Keywords:
Nonparametric testPermutation testResampling

More Related Videos

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.4K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Permutation tests are widely used but often rely on a limited number of random permutations.
  • Theoretical analyses typically assume the entire permutation group, leading to random permutation methods being viewed as approximations.
  • There is a scarcity of literature on the exactness of random permutation testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a rigorous proof of exactness for random permutation tests.
  • To offer an alternative perspective by framing the test as a conditional Monte Carlo test.
  • To extend existing results and demonstrate their applicability to multiple testing procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Conditional Monte Carlo testing framework.
  • Mathematical proof of exactness for random permutations.
  • Extension of theoretical results.

Main Results:

  • Demonstration that random permutation tests can achieve exactness.
  • Validation of the conditional Monte Carlo approach for permutation testing.
  • Theoretical groundwork for analyzing multiple testing procedures.

Conclusions:

  • Random permutation tests are not inherently approximate and can be exact.
  • The conditional Monte Carlo framework provides a robust method for proving exactness.
  • These findings have significant implications for the theoretical underpinnings of multiple testing procedures.