Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Intradermal Inoculation of Mycobacterium avium in the Mouse Ear
Published on: July 3, 2025
Estimation of Performance Characteristics of Analytical Methods for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
Sophie Butot1, Matteo Ricchi2, Iker A Sevilla3
1Nestlé Institute of Food Safety & Analytical Sciences, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Paratuberculosis is a chronic enteric infection, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), affecting virtually all ruminants as well as other animals. MAP is also suspected to be involved in the etiology of some human diseases, like Crohn's disease and others. In surveillance studies, different analytical methodologies were employed to detect MAP, showing different results and incidence in dairy products. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of three analytical methods [culture, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMS) phage-based assay] for MAP detection in raw, heat-treated and powdered milk. The methods were evaluated according to performance characteristics defined for qualitative methods in ISO 16140-2:2016. To estimate sensitivity (including trueness) and LOD, 720, and 900 test portions, respectively, were blind tested by two laboratories. Considering all matrices, different sensitivities, expressed as the percentage of positives from the total of true positive test portions, were obtained for IS900 qPCR (94%), f57 qPCR (76%), culture (83%), and PMS-phage (40%). Trueness, expressed as results correctly assigned (including positive and negative) to the reference value, was 93% for the IS900 qPCR method, 89% for culture and 49% for the PMS-phage. The LODs obtained in this study were similar to the LODs previously published for cultural and qPCR methods. However, for the PMS-phage method, the obtained results showed higher LOD values compared to the limited data available in the scientific literature. Our results highlight that while the PMS-phage assay is workable in pure liquid culture for estimation of MAP counts, its usage for surveillance of dairy matrices should be treated with a lot of caution as performance characteristics obtained were lower than for the two other methods tested. qPCR and culture are the most appropriate methods to detect MAP in milk-based matrices according to ISO 16140 methodology. Cultural techniques are considered the gold standard for detection of viable MAP, but qPCR, which is widely used in analytical and surveillance studies, can be considered a suitable and recommendable alternative to cultural methods for screening, if confirmation of MAP's viability is not requested.
Insights
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) detection in milk was evaluated using culture, qPCR, and PMS-phage assays. qPCR and culture methods demonstrated superior performance for MAP surveillance in dairy products compared to PMS-phage.
Area of Science:
- Food microbiology
- Veterinary diagnostics
- Analytical chemistry
Background:
- Paratuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), is a significant enteric infection in ruminants with suspected links to human diseases.
- Accurate detection of MAP in dairy products is crucial for surveillance and public health, yet different analytical methods yield varying results.
- Standardized performance evaluation is necessary to determine the most reliable methods for MAP detection in diverse milk matrices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance characteristics of three analytical methods for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) detection in raw, heat-treated, and powdered milk.
- To assess culture, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMS) phage-based assay against ISO 16140-2:2016 standards.
- To determine the sensitivity, trueness, and limit of detection (LOD) of each method across different milk matrices.
Main Methods:
- Performance characteristics of culture, IS900 qPCR, f57 qPCR, and PMS-phage assay were evaluated according to ISO 16140-2:2016 guidelines.
- Two laboratories conducted blind testing on 720 test portions for sensitivity and 900 for LOD estimation across raw, heat-treated, and powdered milk.
- Key performance metrics including sensitivity, trueness, and LOD were quantified for each analytical method.
Main Results:
- Sensitivities varied: IS900 qPCR (94%), culture (83%), f57 qPCR (76%), and PMS-phage (40%).
- Trueness was highest for IS900 qPCR (93%), followed by culture (89%), and PMS-phage (49%).
- LODs for PMS-phage were higher than previously reported, suggesting limitations for dairy matrix surveillance.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and culture methods are the most appropriate for detecting MAP in milk-based matrices, aligning with ISO 16140 methodology.
- While culture is the gold standard for viable MAP detection, qPCR is a suitable alternative for screening when viability confirmation is not required.
- The PMS-phage assay shows limitations for MAP surveillance in dairy products due to lower performance characteristics compared to qPCR and culture.
More Related Videos
06:57Author Spotlight: Adjuvant Activity of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Enhancing the Immunogenicity of Autoantigens During Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Published on: May 12, 2023
06:27Identification of Mycobacterium Species by DNA Microarray Chip Method
Published on: June 24, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Development of Analytical Methods
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Characteristics of Life
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution
Jung's Analytical Theory