Surgical and sensory outcomes in patients with intermittent exotropia according to preoperative refractive error
Ye Jin Ahn1, Yoo Yeon Park1, Yeon Woong Chung2
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background/Objectives:
To analyze the surgical and sensory outcomes of intermittent exotropia according to refractive errors and the factors associated with surgical success.
Subjects/Methods:
A total of 326 children were divided into three groups according to preoperative refractive error; hyperopic eyes with SE ≥+2D (hyperopic group), eyes with SE between -1D and +2D (emmetropic group), and myopic eyes with SE ≤-1D (myopic group). The surgical outcomes and the sensory outcomes measured by near and distant stereoacuity were compared among the three groups.
Results:
The surgical success rate in hyperopic group was significantly lower compared to myopic group at last follow-up (P = 0.012). Preoperative near stereopsis was not different among three groups, however, the distance stereopsis was significantly deteriorated in the hyperopic group compared to the other two groups (Titmus; P = 0.168, FD2; P < 0.001, DR; P = 0.048). There was postoperative improvement in both near and distant stereopsis in all three groups (Titmus; P = 0.009, FD2; P = 0.021, DR; P = 0.036) and no significant difference was found in the postoperative distant stereopsis among the three groups.
Conclusions:
Preoperative refractive error is a prognostic factor of surgical success in patients with intermittent exotropia. Patients with hyperopia achieved less favorable surgical outcome compared to myopic patients. The preoperative distant stereoacuity was decreased in hyperopic patients compared to myopic patients, which eventually improved after surgery and showed no significant difference at postoperative measurements.
Related Concept Videos
What is a Sensory System?
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Random Error
Margin of Error
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...


