Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Treating Frozen Shoulder with Small Needle Knife Therapy
Published on: November 17, 2023
Clinical efficacy and safety of anticholinergic therapies in pediatric patients
1Allergy and Asthma Care of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, NY, USA, drsgoldstein@gmail.com.
Insights
Uncontrolled asthma significantly impacts children and adolescents. This review explores novel clinical endpoints and patient-centered factors to improve pediatric asthma treatment effectiveness and quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Asthma Therapeutics
Background:
- Uncontrolled asthma poses a significant health burden on children and adolescents.
- Current treatment guidelines, such as the Global Initiative for Asthma, differ for various pediatric age groups.
- Limited new asthma therapies have been approved for pediatric populations in the past decade.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review challenges in pediatric asthma clinical trials.
- To identify and evaluate alternative clinical endpoints beyond traditional measures.
- To discuss factors influencing treatment adherence and quality of life in pediatric asthma patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on pediatric asthma management and clinical trial methodologies.
- Analysis of traditional versus novel clinical endpoints for pediatric asthma.
- Consideration of patient-centered factors, including device usability and preferences.
Main Results:
- Pediatric lung function testing presents unique challenges compared to adults.
- Traditional endpoints like FEV1 and exacerbations have limitations in pediatric trials.
- Emerging endpoints, such as FEF25-75%, and patient preferences may offer more relevant insights.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing pediatric asthma treatment requires exploring endpoints sensitive to this population.
- Incorporating patient preferences and device considerations can enhance adherence and quality of life.
- Recent approvals, like tiotropium for ages 6+, indicate progress in pediatric asthma management.
Abstract:
The burden of uncontrolled asthma in children and adolescents is high. Treatment options for pediatric patients (aged under 18 years) with asthma are largely influenced by the Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations. Algorithms for adolescents (12-18 years) and adults are identical, but recommendations for children aged under 6 years and 6-11 years differ. Although the goals of treatment for pediatric patients with asthma are similar to those for adults, relatively few new therapies have been approved for this patient population within the last decade. Designing clinical trials involving children presents several challenges, notably that children are often less able to perform lung function tests, and traditional endpoints used in clinical trials with adults, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma exacerbations and questionnaires, have limitations associated with their use in children. There are also ethical considerations related to the performance of longer placebo-controlled exacerbation trials. This review considers additional clinical endpoints to those traditionally reported, including forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of forced vital capacity, which may help shed light on which treatments are most effective for use in pediatric patients with asthma. The pros and cons of specific and potentially clinically relevant endpoints are considered, along with device considerations and patient preferences that may enhance adherence and quality of life. Recent advances in the management of children and adolescents, including the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval of tiotropium in patients with asthma aged 6 years and over, are also discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Survey Safety
Self-Efficacy

