Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mickey Mouse's negative affect facing mistakes.

Vassilissa Dolivo1

  • 1Behavioural Ecology, Institute for Ecology and Evolution Bern, Bern, Switzerland. vassilissadolivo@hotmail.com.

Learning & Behavior
|April 3, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When deciding to cooperate by direct reciprocity, Norway rats sometimes benefit from olfactory competence and seem not impaired by insufficient cognitive abilities.

Animal cognition·2023
Same author

Environmental enrichment of young adult rats (Rattus norvegicus) in different sensory modalities has long-lasting effects on their ability to learn via specific sensory channels.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2017
Same author

Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats.

Learning & behavior·2016
Same author

Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received.

Biology letters·2015
Same author

Fruit flies learn to avoid odours associated with virulent infection.

Biology letters·2014

Animal cognition research shows that decisions are not solely driven by maximizing fitness. Factors like avoiding regret and individual flavor preferences influence choices, even when foraging for food.

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Animal cognition
  • Decision-making

Background:

  • Animal behavior and cognition studies often assume fitness maximization, such as nutritional reward, as the sole driver of decision-making.
  • This perspective may overlook other influential factors in animal choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate non-obvious factors influencing decision-making in animals, beyond direct fitness benefits.
  • To explore if factors like aversion to changing one's mind or individual preferences impact choices in a food-restricted environment.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved observing animal choices in a controlled, food-restricted setting.
  • Researchers analyzed decision-making processes, considering factors beyond simple food acquisition efficiency.
Keywords:
FitnessInterindividual variabilityLearningPondering strategyRegret avoidanceRodents

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Animals demonstrated decision-making influenced by factors not directly related to foraging efficiency.
  • Avoidance of negative affect associated with changing decisions and individual flavor preferences were identified as significant influences.
  • These non-nutritional factors can impact, and sometimes impair, foraging efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Decision-making in animal cognition is more complex than solely optimizing for fitness.
  • Factors such as regret aversion and sensory preferences play a crucial role in behavioral choices.
  • Understanding these non-fitness-related drivers is essential for a comprehensive view of animal behavior.