Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Revalidation of a Perioperative Risk Assessment Measure for Skin
Anita J Meehan1, Nancy R Beinlich, James F Bena
1Anita J. Meehan, MSN, RN-BC, CNOR(e), ONC, FNGNA, is Clinical Nurse Specialist, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Ohio. Nancy R. Beinlich, MSN, RN, CWON, is Professional Development Specialist, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Ohio. James F. Bena, MS, is Lead Statistician, Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. Caroline Mangira, RN, MPH, is Biostatistician, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Ohio.
The Perioperative Risk Assessment for Skin (PRAMS) tool effectively identifies surgical patients at risk for developing pressure injuries (PIs). This validated measure aids in timely prevention interventions for at-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research
- Surgical Patient Care
- Wound Prevention
Background:
- Validated perioperative pressure injury (PI) risk assessment tools are scarce and often difficult to use.
- This leads to missed opportunities for targeted prevention interventions for at-risk surgical patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To revalidate the six-item Perioperative Risk Assessment for Skin (PRAMS) measure in a larger, more generalizable sample.
- To confirm the efficacy of PRAMS in identifying patients at risk for postsurgical PIs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 1,526 adult surgical patients across multiple specialties.
- Evaluation of the PRAMS tool's diagnostic ability using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
- Analysis of risk indicators including diabetes, age, surgical time, Braden score, previous surgery, and preexisting PI.
Main Results:
- The PRAMS tool demonstrated high effectiveness in identifying patients who developed postsurgical PIs (sensitivity = 0.98).
- Patients with PIs had lower Braden scores, preexisting PIs, and prior surgeries (p < .001).
- The tool showed a high negative predictive value (0.98), indicating patients without identified risk factors were unlikely to develop PIs.
Conclusions:
- The revalidated PRAMS tool is effective for identifying patients at risk of developing postsurgical pressure injuries.
- PRAMS utilizes readily available perioperative information, facilitating practical application by staff.
- This supports improved targeted prevention strategies for surgical patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Sensory Functions of the Skin
There are two main categories of receptors on the skin: capsulated and non-capsulated. The non-capsulated ones are mainly the pain receptors. The capsulated ones can be further categorized based on the...

