Application of Cultured Epidermal Homograft (Kaloderm) for Wide Scar Treatment
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Visualizing Scar Development Using SCAD Assay - An Ex-situ Skin Scarring Assay
Published on: April 28, 2022
Joon Seok Lee1, Seung Gyun Chu1, Jeong Woo Lee1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
Background:
For the treatment of wide scars, laser resurfacing procedures are generally used. However, sometimes their results are not satisfactory. Many clinical studies have reported that cultured epidermal allogenic sheets promote rapid and good quality wound healing. Therefore, the authors applied a cultured epidermal homograft (CEH) for scar management and investigated its outcomes.
Methods:
Thirty-two patients who received a CEH (Kaloderm) after laser resurfacing (n = 14, under general anesthesia; n = 18, under local anesthesia) between February 2016 and June 2017 were enrolled. Patients treated with dermabrasion using laser resurfacing (n = 60) without CEH in the same period were used as controls. Clinical grading of the scars was performed using a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at postoperative 12 months.
Results:
The authors conducted a comparative analysis between the control and CEH groups. Evaluation based on Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale showed that the mean scores in control/CEH groups for the 7 observer components (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and overall opinion) were 4.5/3.2, 3.3/2.8, 2.8/2.5, 3.6/3.5, 3.7/2.1, 2.3/1.9, and 3.2/2.7, respectively, with significant differences observed in vascularity, pliability, and surface area (P values = 0.033, 0.021, and 0.048, respectively). Meanwhile, the mean scores in control/CEH groups for 7 patient components (pain, itching sense, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion) were 4.1/2.3, 3/3.1, 2.2/2.1, 2.2/1.7, 3.6/3.5, 1.8/1.5, and 2.2/1.9, respectively, with significant differences between groups observed in pain, stiffness, and overall opinion in the paired t test (P values = 0.041, 0.020, and 0.048, respectively).
Conclusion:
Cultured epidermal homograft provided good quality wound healing and improved scar pliability. Cultured epidermal homograft left less scarring with no pain or other specific complications. Therefore, dermabrasion with CEH is useful for scar management.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
Renewal of Skin Epidermal Stem Cells
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...

